Do lawmakers impose taxes on juices?
Not here, we don't have added sugar in juices just the sugar that is there already. The tax is aimed at getting children off what we call fizzy drinks, children who drink a lot of these don't tend to drink fruit juices/tea/milk etc. It's quite specific, the tax is on the manufacturers who will need to produce drinks with less sugar in not to pay it.
Similar taxes have worked in five other countries, with some methods reducing consumption of fizzy drinks by up to one quarter.
"Mexico, which has one of the world's worst weight problems with a third of adults obese, introduced a 10 per cent sugar tax on sugar-sweetened drinks in 2014. A paper published in the BMJ in January found that sales of fizzy drinks had fallen by 12 per cent in the first year.
In Hungary, the introduction of a tax on companies has led to a 40 per cent reduction in levels of sugar products."
Sugar tax: what does it mean, which drinks will be affected, and will it work?
One thing I don't understand is people saying this is a tax on the poor. There's plenty of drinks around like low sugar/sugar free squashes around ( I assume they have these in US but don't know what you call them). they are cheaper and better for you anyway. why do people think poor people don't want to eat healthily or that they actually don't.
› Why the fizzy drinks tax should be implemented | Oral Health Foundation