Siu Lim Tau Comparison

How else would you like me to explain how forward pressure on the outside of someone's forearm moves their arm? If I'm punching him in his face, and his arm is in my line of attack it will be pushed inwards. This by no means says that I am focusing on pushing his arm, my focus is on punching him in the face. His arm getting pushed inward is due to the kinesiology of how the arm moves.

If you say push the arm, I think push the arm. Why blame me?

What you describe sounds exactly like what is shown in the videos on the Cutting Punch thread. Not sure why everyone is avoiding that one...
 
Has nothing to do with inability to grab and he didn't invent VT.

Why do you think he would teach students with two hands a handicapped version of VT?

If it's fair to say that anyone who learned WC in a manner not consistent with WSLPB VT and are believed "broken", because that's what they learned. Then it's only fair to state that what he teaches is "handicapped" because that's what he learned.
 
If you say push the arm, I think push the arm. Why blame me?

What you describe sounds exactly like what is shown in the videos on the Cutting Punch thread. Not sure why everyone is avoiding that one...
In description, yes. In application as to that video, no. He is chasing the arm and has at times a flared elbow, better off to block then attack if that's how they are going to approach it.

The elbow should be as it is when you throw a straight punch. And never focus on the incoming arm to apply a gate punch. The punch goes to it's target not the arm. The redirection of their punch from their line of attack is a byproduct of the gate punch. It is a secondary action, the primary action is the punch.
 
If it's fair to say that anyone who learned WC in a manner not consistent with WSLPB VT and are believed "broken", because that's what they learned. Then it's only fair to state that what he teaches is "handicapped" because that's what he learned.

Systems are broken when they are inconsistent/incoherent, not when they are different to WSL VT
 
Not being coy at all. When I spoke of Outer & Inner Gate punching, others agreed it was the same thing. It's simply using the straight punch as a block & strike in one united motion. Not block then strike, just a punch that intercepts an incoming attack on the way to your target.

It's basic WC stuff. I don't see how anyone, who learned the straight punch, never learned how to apply it in this manner. It's Lin Siu Dai Da in a singular punch.

Then why so unsure about what KPM is doing in his video clip with the excluding punch?
 
Then why so unsure about what KPM is doing in his video clip with the excluding punch?
I'm not unsure. I said I'll let him clarify. It was the descriptions I was unsure of. I'm only speaking to my gate punches.

This entire conversation seems very colluded. Why isn't it being discussed in the Cutting Punch thread? I suspect there would be less confusion. Until a couple of minutes ago, I didn't even know there was a thread for this topic. Perhaps you all should take your conversation there.
 
What about the punch in KPM's clip?
I didn't see what I would refer to as gate punching there. There we're elements of it, but it wasn't applied in the manner I would consider a true gate punch. That being said, I also don't want to speak for KPM. He knows more about what he is doing than I do. I'll only speak to YCW WC.
 
The elbow should be as it is when you throw a straight punch. And never focus on the incoming arm to apply a gate punch. The punch goes to it's target not the arm. The redirection of their punch from their line of attack is a byproduct of the gate punch. It is a secondary action, the primary action is the punch.

Is the difference between the two (inside and outside gate punch) just the angle at which you throw the punch then, relative to the incoming punch, or are you doing something else to wedge them out one way or the other?

This entire conversation seems very colluded. Why isn't it being discussed in the Cutting Punch thread?

We're discussing elbow, which is what SNT is all about, though the idea is missing in other lineages I've observed.
 
My concern is the "power generation" should be the most important part of the beginner's training,


is completely missing in the Ip Men's SLT training.

Dude...if you're concerned about it, then go invent "kung fu wangs wing chun" and do what you want.
But to say it is missing in YM's WC is a gross misunderstanding and lack of comprehensive knowledge of WC.
 
Is the difference between the two (inside and outside gate punch) just the angle at which you throw the punch then, relative to the incoming punch, or are you doing something else to wedge them out one way or the other?



We're discussing elbow, which is what SNT is all about, though the idea is missing in other lineages I've observed.
No the difference is your punch in relation to the opponents forearm being above or below yours. A gate punch should not be deliberate IMO, it should occur as a byproduct. To deliberately try and stop/divert his punch by punching would be arm chasing. A gate punch is a punch that, as a secondary action, intercepts their arm. You do not aim for their arm, you aim for your target. It's not a technique I would count on. Best to let it naturally occur.

This conversation really belongs in the other thread, despite it's tenuous links to SNT. Is that not why the other thread was created? Specifically for this topic.
 
Last edited:
No the difference is your punch in relation to the opponents forearm being above or below yours. A gate punch should not be deliberate IMO, it should occur as a byproduct. To deliberately try and stop/divert his punch by punching would be arm chasing. A gate punch is a punch that, as a secondary action, intercepts their arm. You do not aim for their arm, you aim for your target. It's not a technique I would count on. Best to let it naturally occur.

This conversation really belongs in the other thread, despite it's tenuous links to SNT. Is that not why the other thread was created? Specifically for this topic.

Does footage of this gate punch exist on the internet?
 
He does have a clip. Must have forgotten.

It's at 3:15 here from his paak-sau drill. What he calls the "excluding punch".

As with the video I posted on the Cutting Punch thread, there is no elbow idea here. It's wrist-led and cutting diagonally across the line with the forearm. Same as his "paak-sau touch & go" being wrist-led, as most lineages do jam-sau from the wrist.



Ah! Thanks! I had forgotten I had covered it on that clip! But no, you are wrong. Watch it again at 3:19. Look at the elbow. There is a difference between "touch & go" and the "excluding punch". As I wrote before, the excluding punch is much more like a Jum Sau that goes forward. The elbow is down and in and driving the motion. It is not "wrist-led" because the wrist is already past the point of contact. There most certainly is an "elbow idea" here. You think you can "see" an idea so easily on a video clip????
 
Quick point of differentiation between what we call the "capping punch" and what's shown at 3:15 here as the "excluding punch." The capping punch just drives right through and the forearm of the punch itself serves as the deflective surface. There's no intermediary pak sao before the punch, the punch is the deflection and the strike.

~ Alan

Sorry Alan. But you misinterpreted what I was doing. Watch the clip again. The whole clip. The excluding or cutting punch does not have a Pak Sao before the punch.
 
Ah! Thanks! I had forgotten I had covered it on that clip! But no, you are wrong. Watch it again at 3:19. Look at the elbow. There is a difference between "touch & go" and the "excluding punch". As I wrote before, the excluding punch is much more like a Jum Sau that goes forward. The elbow is down and in and driving the motion. It is not "wrist-led" because the wrist is already past the point of contact. There most certainly is an "elbow idea" here. You think you can "see" an idea so easily on a video clip????

Can see what the elbow is doing in a clip
 
Back
Top