Jeff I know exactly where you are coming from, but please go over to those other forums when you feel the totally understandable need to "trash talk". The really cool thing about this place is that we disagree respectfully. It makes it a much cooler place to hang out.
As far as the politics goes, I've had similar experiences. When I first left WT, I just drifted away, attending to the demands of career and family. I never publicly aired my disappointment with the politics and business dealings of the organization so I wasn't "shunned" or anything like that. When I ran into my old dai-hing (kung fu brothers) we had pleasant exchanges. But many years later, when I joined the independent NVTO, stuff hit the fan. Now my oldest WT kung-fu brother (who I've known and trained with since 1979) won't even speak to me or answer a friendly email. Total excommunication. I guess I'm lucky I got out of that cult!
Honestly, I never fit in that well anyway. I was one of the guys who always asked "annoying questions". Now the shoe is on the other foot. Last night a student asked me an "annoying question" about a particular low level self defense technique against a headlock and takedown. He didn't think it would work reliably against a much larger, stronger opponent who had a grappling background. So I demonstrated it against the biggest guy in the class. He's 20 years younger that me, 80 pounds heavier, strong as an ox, and has a grappling background. Also, he's stubborn. That is to say a nice, respectful guy, but never "compliant".
So we did the technique and he grabbed me like he was going to rip my head off. Guess what? The defense didn't work! Especially when I let him get it on me really good. See, that's what I mean by an "annoying question" ...proving that something in the curriculum is ...a bit questionable at best. Problem is, I must be a crappy teacher ...because I love questions like that! So the big guy and I, along with another big guy who also grapples and has a Primary-Level rank will be getting together this weekend to improve our way of dealing with this attack.
See, that's what's wrong with me. I'd rather test my stuff and risk looking imperfect ...even in front of students, than teach them orthodox "crap". Also, makes training a lot more interesting.
As far as the politics goes, I've had similar experiences. When I first left WT, I just drifted away, attending to the demands of career and family. I never publicly aired my disappointment with the politics and business dealings of the organization so I wasn't "shunned" or anything like that. When I ran into my old dai-hing (kung fu brothers) we had pleasant exchanges. But many years later, when I joined the independent NVTO, stuff hit the fan. Now my oldest WT kung-fu brother (who I've known and trained with since 1979) won't even speak to me or answer a friendly email. Total excommunication. I guess I'm lucky I got out of that cult!
Honestly, I never fit in that well anyway. I was one of the guys who always asked "annoying questions". Now the shoe is on the other foot. Last night a student asked me an "annoying question" about a particular low level self defense technique against a headlock and takedown. He didn't think it would work reliably against a much larger, stronger opponent who had a grappling background. So I demonstrated it against the biggest guy in the class. He's 20 years younger that me, 80 pounds heavier, strong as an ox, and has a grappling background. Also, he's stubborn. That is to say a nice, respectful guy, but never "compliant".
So we did the technique and he grabbed me like he was going to rip my head off. Guess what? The defense didn't work! Especially when I let him get it on me really good. See, that's what I mean by an "annoying question" ...proving that something in the curriculum is ...a bit questionable at best. Problem is, I must be a crappy teacher ...because I love questions like that! So the big guy and I, along with another big guy who also grapples and has a Primary-Level rank will be getting together this weekend to improve our way of dealing with this attack.
See, that's what's wrong with me. I'd rather test my stuff and risk looking imperfect ...even in front of students, than teach them orthodox "crap". Also, makes training a lot more interesting.