drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
So, anecdotal evidence of non-anecdotal evidence?
Yeah pretty much.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, anecdotal evidence of non-anecdotal evidence?
And while I am well versed in BJJ/Judo, I want to add more in the punch defense and so on. So what do you pontificate about in this area as it relates to self defense?
saw this on facebook. It kind off applies to half the threads on here. But I will shove it in this one.
Basic grappling and basic striking wins fights.
wins them in the dojo.
wins them in competition.
wins them in the street.
And there is no suprise why there is that common element.
Do all the kangaroos look like they're doing P90X?double post.
Do all the kangaroos look like they're doing P90X?
That was awesome, I really enjoyed that.
But the one at the two minute mark that went on for a while - I'm so glad that second officer wasn't my partner. That boy needs some serious DT training. Teats on a bull, right there.
This is a question that comes through our gym from time to time, and it is also something I have been pontificating about as well. I know that I watch a lot of videos of street fights, self defense, concealed carry, and so on. And I know that the self defense classes I listen in on frequently discourage grappling. "You are on the ground and you are dead."
The main problem with BJJ only, is that the BJJer's face, has never been tested regularly at eating punches. Therefore, unless you've fought a lot, you may not know how you would react after getting punched hard there, and repeatedly. Many people who train Muay Thai or whatever, for years, may also not know neither because they often quit when there's too much sparring (light to med) and especially when the sparring raises in power levels. Self Defense people are usually the weakest in this dept., although they always claim that they have all of the bases covered better than anyone else.
Spigot is a good nickname. We have guys with nicknames like "Earmuff" and "Nutshot."Most people don't like to get punched in the face. I don't mind. The foundation of our modern combatives curriculum is bareknuckle style boxing so we can have good movement, body awareness, and inoculation to a good jab to the snot box. We've had our share of bloody noses, but it's handy to know if you bleed easily. We have one guy we call "Spigot" because his nose bleeds so easily. Now he won't freak out seeing his own blood if he eats a good one. We also do the basics of grappling, both standing and on the ground. Knife defence is essentially high-stakes standup grappling. I supplement that part with both Judo and medieval wrestling.
Always?The main problem with BJJ only, is that the BJJer's face, has never been tested regularly at eating punches. Therefore, unless you've fought a lot, you may not know how you would react after getting punched hard there, and repeatedly. Many people who train Muay Thai or whatever, for years, may also not know neither because they often quit when there's too much sparring (light to med) and especially when the sparring raises in power levels. Self Defense people are usually the weakest in this dept., although they always claim that they have all of the bases covered better than anyone else.
Always?
Agreed, hence my question about this post (bolded the point in question):"Always", would imply an all or nothing statement which would only take ONE exception to disprove such.
The main problem with BJJ only, is that the BJJer's face, has never been tested regularly at eating punches. Therefore, unless you've fought a lot, you may not know how you would react after getting punched hard there, and repeatedly. Many people who train Muay Thai or whatever, for years, may also not know neither because they often quit when there's too much sparring (light to med) and especially when the sparring raises in power levels. Self Defense people are usually the weakest in this dept., although they always claim that they have all of the bases covered better than anyone else.
Agreed, hence my question about this post (bolded the point in question):
Often?Didn't know that I was under oath or some joint. The internet is some serious biznit. Ok, I'll help you out. Change it to:
Self Defense people are usually the weakest in this dept., although they often claim that they have many to all of the bases covered better than anyone else....wait, most anyone else, but not too much while more than somewhat anyone else.
You can take this whichever way you wish, but your statement about "always" was actually my point. You made the point for me. If you wish to mock it, that's up to you.Didn't know that I was under oath or some joint. The internet is some serious biznit. Ok, I'll help you out. Change it to:
Self Defense people are usually the weakest in this dept., although they often claim that they have many to all of the bases covered better than anyone else....wait, most anyone else, but not too much while more than somewhat anyone else.
You can take this whichever way you wish, but your statement about "always" was actually my point. You made the point for me. If you wish to mock it, that's up to you.
You really don't get it, do you?Didn't I correct it for you though? You're welcome.