RSK,
You have to admit though that your 'constructive critisism' is being met favorably by me. I don't mind being educated...I just don't like being 'pushed'. In that light we have decided to adopt a name that has no Asian influence so as not to be grammatically incorrect. Simply an American name. Same system, same training, same target audience just a different name, rank structure, titles etc. In this way we can show pride in our country as well as respect those in which we have recieved training i.e America, Asia, Canada, Europe and the Middle East.
We are not going to stress or use belt ranks or terms, rather the training itself will be the only focus. An individual will be either a practitioner or an Instructor. We hardly wore belts anyway.
As I've said, anymore I honestly don't put any stock in anyone's rank. I don't say this out of disrespect to anyone. But let's be honest, what the wall candy says doesn't necessarily relate to teaching ability or practical ability in a real world altercation. I still 'stand by' my wall candy...but it is where it belongs, in a box. I feel my teaching skill should speak for me in training not paper on the wall. That is just my opinion and where I'm at in this period of my life. Anybody can challenge anyone's 'credentials' but it is another thing entirely with actual skill. Seeing is truly believing and I prefer to let my skill and teaching ability speak for me.
I will thank you RSK and several of the others sincerely for assisting with the direction we have taken. Hopefully we can coexist here in peace and perhaps continue to learn what is offered by each other.
I've asked Bob to perhaps change my screen name to reflect the new one. Peace :asian: