Rob,
For me, it's not about who new Remy the bestest for the longest. It's more about seeing an accurate representation of modern arnis. One persons view, obviously, may not be the next persons view, or experience. When you ask a question about modern arnis, you're bound to get varying opinions, some stronger than others.
Now Tapi – Tapi is a great program in Modern Arnis, but one should understand that it is watered down Balintawak.
I don't agree with this. First, I don't think that anyone who has heard "Remy created tapi tapi to beat balintawak" automatically thinks that they can beat a balintawak player, and I am staying with Tims stick specific post. Anyone can beat anyone else on a given day. Everyone has good days and bad days.
I don't like the sound of the statement that modern arnis is watered down balintawak. IT makes modern arnis sound somehow inferior to balintawak. I admit that I don't know balintawak, so I am using the previous balintawak players posts as the example. It has been stated that there are things that the two systems do that the other does not i.e. grabbing the other persons stick. Obviously this has great advantages such as controlling their stick/arm and body if you understand ballance, off ballancing and connection with the other persons body. Some would say that it is a disadvantage. I say that it depends on the situation.
I respect Tims perspective. I just don't think that anyone can say that one is necessarily better than the other. I don't think Tim is saying that. That is my thought.
At the end of the day, everyone has an opinion.
I think Tim did a decent job of being fair to both styles, except for some of the wording.
My take on Modern Arnis vs. Balintawak
ItÂ’s very hard to compare these two systems. In the case of Modern Arnis it is an all encompassing art, where in BalintawakÂ’s primary purpose is stick dueling.
This pretty much sums it up. Bravo.
Dan McConnell
For me, it's not about who new Remy the bestest for the longest. It's more about seeing an accurate representation of modern arnis. One persons view, obviously, may not be the next persons view, or experience. When you ask a question about modern arnis, you're bound to get varying opinions, some stronger than others.
Now Tapi – Tapi is a great program in Modern Arnis, but one should understand that it is watered down Balintawak.
I don't agree with this. First, I don't think that anyone who has heard "Remy created tapi tapi to beat balintawak" automatically thinks that they can beat a balintawak player, and I am staying with Tims stick specific post. Anyone can beat anyone else on a given day. Everyone has good days and bad days.
I don't like the sound of the statement that modern arnis is watered down balintawak. IT makes modern arnis sound somehow inferior to balintawak. I admit that I don't know balintawak, so I am using the previous balintawak players posts as the example. It has been stated that there are things that the two systems do that the other does not i.e. grabbing the other persons stick. Obviously this has great advantages such as controlling their stick/arm and body if you understand ballance, off ballancing and connection with the other persons body. Some would say that it is a disadvantage. I say that it depends on the situation.
I respect Tims perspective. I just don't think that anyone can say that one is necessarily better than the other. I don't think Tim is saying that. That is my thought.
At the end of the day, everyone has an opinion.
I think Tim did a decent job of being fair to both styles, except for some of the wording.
My take on Modern Arnis vs. Balintawak
ItÂ’s very hard to compare these two systems. In the case of Modern Arnis it is an all encompassing art, where in BalintawakÂ’s primary purpose is stick dueling.
This pretty much sums it up. Bravo.
Dan McConnell