Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's of great value, if you're attacked by one of your own students...slowly.Tgace said:What is the "martial value" of this ****?
:lol:arnisador said:It's of great value, if you're attacked by one of your own students...slowly.
arnisador said:It's of great value, if you're attacked by one of your own students...slowly.
... or can convince your opponent to stand still in the same spot for at least 45 minutes....arnisador said:It's of great value, if you're attacked by one of your own students...slowly.
Uh-huh. And I truly pity anyone who actually goes up against Dillman or any other decent member of DKI thinking that no-touch chi balls are their only method of fighting.Aegis said:Come on ppko, it's hypnotic suggestion, nothing more.
I truly pity anyone who really believes this will ever work against an attacker....
Very true, they probably have more than just this, but this is their most (in)famous technique, and it is the one which will come back and bite them in the *** over and over again when it continues to fail under controlled circumstances)Xequat said:Uh-huh. And I truly pity anyone who actually goes up against Dillman or any other decent member of DKI thinking that no-touch chi balls are their only method of fighting.
Hypnotic suggestion is nothingmore than convincing the subconscious that sdomething is going to happen in response to a stimulus. You don't need to put someone into a trance using a swinging watch in order to do that, you just need to relax them and subtley convince them that something is going to happen. After watching it a few times, the unconscious mind becomes convinced that it will work and it generates an appropriate response. this is my current hypothesis anyway, and it certainly explains why those who go in thinking it won't work are unaffected: hypnosis cannot work if you don't want it to on some level, while real martial arts techniques will work regardless of what your opponent believes.Hypnotic suggestion? That's just as ridiculous as you think the no-touch stuff is. I've never seen Carl Jung stop by a martial arts seminar with a stopwatch, saying "when I count to three, you will believe in magic and drop on your ***.'
You probably know more about cars than the average complete beginner knows about martial arts. Often they assume that all arts are the same, and even if they don't, one bad experience really can put people off starting a martial art.The other issue I have is with this attitude that somehow every martial artist is a representative of some greater calling and grand elite community. Just because Dillman might look insane doing tricks with chi doesn't mean that someone who's looking into joining a MA class for self-defense is now going to change his/her mibd because there's one guy that does weird movie-like stuff. If I'm looking at getting a new car, I don't change my mind and go buy a motorcycle instead because some comic-book freak tells me that his model of car can fly. I just find another dealer that I can agree with.
George Dillman has some good stuff; his bunkai can be fascinating. I have definitely learned things from him.Xequat said:And I truly pity anyone who actually goes up against Dillman or any other decent member of DKI thinking that no-touch chi balls are their only method of fighting.
It's stage magic. Ever seen a stage magician do a hypnotism act?Hypnotic suggestion? That's just as ridiculous as you think the no-touch stuff is.
Oh yeah? OK, I see where you're coming from, then. I've just never seen or heard of that trick.arnisador said:I've seen DKI students stand or kneel in front of a standing or kneeling student of theirs for about a full minute with a hand held in front of the student, with the student told to stand/sit still and concentrate on the hand, and that eventually he'd lose consciousness. Then, it happens (sometimes). I can't differentiate that from stage magic. It's basic hypnotism-for-performance material.
OMG don't tell my wife that caffeine is stronger than chi, I'll never get her to kick the coffee habit! :boing2:Old Fat Kenpoka said:If he had gone to a real coffee shop instead of a McBeans like Starbucks, he would not have been able to move the line with his Chi.
I think it has more to do with people being puzzled over why they're wasting so much of their time on goofy tricks vs the good stuff that's not totally useless in a confrontation.Xequat said:Uh-huh. And I truly pity anyone who actually goes up against Dillman or any other decent member of DKI thinking that no-touch chi balls are their only method of fighting.
lonekimono10 said:Now i want to let everyone know that i have an open mine, so what i;m about to say i don't want anyone to think(there he's goes again)
now the other night my son called me into the living room to look at the tv show that was on, it was about the martial arts and the people in it.
"thats cool" but they had this segment with George Dillman(a good friend)
now my son turns around to me and said "is that true?"
what he was doing was telling people that he can knock them out without touching them, by using chi,i hope someone else saw this.
he had these people holding up this sheet, (he was on one side and the person he was to knock out was on the other side)
he stood there with his hands moving around and then you heard a kia
and the person on the other side was on the floor:idunno:
he also told the reporter that he was in a starbucks and the line was long so he moved them using his chi.
give me some feedback
now i'm not saying anything bad about
dilman's kempo.
evenflow1121 said:I saw it, and even if true, how practical would it be? You would have to sit there and focus to knock the guy out, by that time someone can land 11 punches in my face.
Odin said:okay all joking a side,has anyone thought of a scientific way of trying to prove if this possiable???