My points are strickly pertaining to ground fighting. I don't want to be there to start with and sure don't want to stay there so why would I focus on staying there rolling around?
I have no problem with that philosophy. I just have a strong disagreement with you as to the quickest, safest, and most reliable methods of getting back to your feet if you happen to get taken down and mounted. (For the record, the techniques I would teach for that purpose don't involve focusing on "staying there rolling around.")
SENC-33 said:2 of my long time training partners are experienced shoot fighters. They go at me all the time (with little success) with my intent being to escape and get back to my feet. I don't know maybe my survival philosophy makes the difference.
Just to be clear on what you're saying - you're starting out with these training partners fully mounted on you, they're allowed to strike or use submissions from the top, and you are reliably escaping by either striking from the bottom or turning to your knees underneath them? Is that correct? If it works for you, great. Unless you have a significant advantage in size/athleticism or your training partners aren't very well trained in the ground game, then it doesn't match my experience and observations of what works.