There’s nothing inherently negative (or positive) about giving someone a skin burn. Most likely, the term (both of them) came from someone claiming it’s something a specific group would/might do in a fight or something. It’s an almost certainly incorrect attribution, but I don’t see any racism.Look guys . I'm not going to debate this. Terms like Indian burn are the same as saying you were gypped or that you jewed someone down in a negotiation, or that someone who does something dumb rode the short bus or is a tard.
If you disagree with me, fine. It's okay . I'll judge you though.