Zenjael, your statement that 4th Dan is awarded for "philosophical understanding" is just plain wrong, at least for the majority of arts. I will go so far as to say that I do not know of a single art in which this is true. Can you please enlighten us as to what art or arts award a 4th Dan for philosophical understanding?
I have seen 4th dan's given for perfection of technique, and meeting a set requirement of kata and the like throughout all martial arts. However, when studying Chung Do Kwan under Master Khan, I found that only up to 3rd dan were belts awarded for technical level of the material. However, to receive a 3rd dan you were expected to essentially execute perfect techniques, everytime. As I recall, that was the standard there, and it was met. This was the school mind you who trained Jason Geiger. 4th dan was awarded for ability to translate one's own understanding to another.
Not even once. And I've never seen a 5 year old who could come close. Nor can a 9 year old.
If imperfection were defined by the impossible, than I would argue that naturally one would never come across it. However, if defined by the practical and possible, one does get to witness it on rare occasion, and it is beautiful.
Negative... a black belt is designed to notate a visual representation of a pre-set level of skill achieved. This skill is not solely based on physical performance, but mental & emotional as well.
While there will always be differences in opinion, understand that what a black belt 'is', is many things, and sometimes the definition of one conflicts with the other. This does not denote disagreement, or refutation of the other's system. Some systems have no belts, at all, and degree of skill is awarded based upon ability, rather than any formalized ranking. Those are the teachers I've come to find myself seeking, today.
And your years of experience in kenjutsu is how many?? Along with everything else you've covered in your brief time sharing air??...A five year old?? Seriously?? You're questioning an adult (Manny) about his understanding of "the meaning of a black belt'?? Seriously?? Junior... my original black belt was already fading & shredding before you were born. You have a ton of nerve to question a senior (in life as well as verifiable MA training) if he understands something.
I have humbly admitted before that my 20 years are nothing compared to others. However, the most skillful practitioner I have ever met, with the deepest insight to the art, had only been practicing for 6 years, and his level of mastery was beyond that of most people I've met and witnessed. if you doubt his validity, he instructed the tai chi organization at NVCC, and is the only person I've met I think with proficient mastery respectively to bagua, xing yi and taijiquan that he could perform 3 sisters form.
Age becomes irrelevant in terms of mastery. If you care to disagree that there is an intrinsic right associated with experience, than that is your fair due, and you can always act upon that at your own school. But understand our differing of opinion does not make either of us incorrect, or each other's methodology uncouth.
I will concede a child who is a master would be a rare sight, but then again, that was also my point. Look past the superficial of age, and that of ability. I have not practiced kenjutsu long enough to make any great claim, merely that I can recognize good technique when performed, and that in my years of many different schools and teachers, who a good teacher is and who isn't. Among the best teachers I had when first learning kendo, before kenjutsu, was a 9 year old girl.
I am sorry if my stance has irked you, but I do not think I am incorrect. You attacked my age and experience, not my argument. I do not need to find you a child with preternatural skill and advanced insight, to you it would not be enough how much more than you they knew.
I mean really, ask yourself, if you were the most experienced martial artist on earth, given fortunately early training, and allowed to have a life of longetivity, who would you choose to learn from?
You never stop, and though I know assuming makes an **** out of oneself and the other, it seems to me that your answer would be no one.
I don't long for others to bow to me, merely to improve what I know. Hence why I am here.
But if we do not differ in opinion, there would be no beauty in the variety of different arts. Our disagreement is what allows understanding, not just for us, but others to grow. I don't want to think anyone deserving, would ever be withheld their just respect, because they were deemed 'too young' when the very thing stopping them is arbitrary, and subjective to each of us. I don't think that objective enough to be a legitimate reason to uphold ranking from anyone, which is all ranking conveys; due respect.