heretic888
Senior Master
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2002
- Messages
- 2,723
- Reaction score
- 60
If you'll read my post, you'll find no assertion that Marx is the only way to see things.
Errr... I don't recall saying he was. I was simply point out that Marx himself only focuses on an extremely limited slice of the whole pie (if you will), and has a tendency to treat that piece as if it was the whole (with any non-materialistic philosophy being, in his view, an "opiate of the masses" --- a conclusion I would basically agree with, with the qualifier that it applies to all concrete-literal philosophies, whether religious or secular).
I'd also point out that Marx is not responsible for the monotony of capitalism.
Perceived monotony, anyway.
Don't get me wrong, I believe that there are some very important truths to socialism that humanity would do well to embrace --- I just think we shall do so when we are collectively ready, and now does not appear to be that time. At the same time, there are qualities from capitalism that we should be sure to preserve, as well. At any event, I think it is a more utopian view, if anything, and the particulars that Marx outlined (such as violent revolution) don't particularly sit well with me.
I do believe, however, that Marx himself engaged in a very extreme form of reductionism and materialism (with all philosophies being relegated to his 'ideologies' of oppression), and tended to miss out on a big piece of the pie due to that.
Laterz.