Martin h
Green Belt
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2002
- Messages
- 133
- Reaction score
- 5
Genbukan is a splintergroup from Bujinkan and the founder (Tanemura) was a student of Hatsumi (and of the same teachers as Hatsumi). But they had a falling out and parted ways.
Bujinkan consist of 9 ryus where Hatsumi is the current head.
According to Hatsumi, the one of the 9 (now known as "Koto Ryu Koppojutsu") was once known as "Shinden Koto-ryuu Karate". And was founded byTaro Kunishige around 1300 (no I have no idea if this is recognised by japanese historians or if he has valid documentation for its lineage -but it is what he claims).
Hatsumi is also careful to point out that this is not a type of karate as karate is known today, it is merely a case of a term (karate=chinese hand) being used in the same way for similar reasons (to indicate chinese roots) at different places at different times. Also he uses the term "karate" only in historical references, he does not use it on the current ryu.
Genbukan uses the mostly same history as bujinkan, but does not claim to teach exactly the same ryus (and varies a bit with names). It does not look like tkd+jujutsu as some described it, but being a "ninjutsu" style I guess they might have problem with "quality controll" of their gaijin teachers -so I would not be that supprised to find a tkd+jujutsu guy teach what he calls "genbukan" without realy knowing the real stuff.
But even if they dont claim their karate is the same thing as okinawan karate, I realy wish they would use the more generic word "kempo" instead.
Bujinkan consist of 9 ryus where Hatsumi is the current head.
According to Hatsumi, the one of the 9 (now known as "Koto Ryu Koppojutsu") was once known as "Shinden Koto-ryuu Karate". And was founded byTaro Kunishige around 1300 (no I have no idea if this is recognised by japanese historians or if he has valid documentation for its lineage -but it is what he claims).
Hatsumi is also careful to point out that this is not a type of karate as karate is known today, it is merely a case of a term (karate=chinese hand) being used in the same way for similar reasons (to indicate chinese roots) at different places at different times. Also he uses the term "karate" only in historical references, he does not use it on the current ryu.
Genbukan uses the mostly same history as bujinkan, but does not claim to teach exactly the same ryus (and varies a bit with names). It does not look like tkd+jujutsu as some described it, but being a "ninjutsu" style I guess they might have problem with "quality controll" of their gaijin teachers -so I would not be that supprised to find a tkd+jujutsu guy teach what he calls "genbukan" without realy knowing the real stuff.
But even if they dont claim their karate is the same thing as okinawan karate, I realy wish they would use the more generic word "kempo" instead.