"Evil" or even "force for evil" is a very broad, wide-reaching term. Even an "evil" government can do good; even a "good" government can do evil. Has the US been involved of late in ill-considered actions that have led to poor outcomes? Certainly. Could those outcomes be considered "evil"? Again, certainly. Does that make the US "evil" or a "force for evil"? That's not so clear - because at the same time the US has been involved in such negative actions, it has also been involved in positive ones as well. Who is to say which actions outweigh which others? That is for history to decide.
One of the problems I see with the media today is that there is so much information available, from so many different sources and slants, that it takes a great deal of time and effort to tease out actualities from the interpretations of the presenters... and too many people don't take the time necessary to find the actuality hidden within the presentation, and react based on the presentation, or their interpretation of the presentation. And yet, the wide range of information available, from such a wide range of sources, is also a strength. One must take the time to separate the wheat from the chaff.
One of the problems I see with the media today is that there is so much information available, from so many different sources and slants, that it takes a great deal of time and effort to tease out actualities from the interpretations of the presenters... and too many people don't take the time necessary to find the actuality hidden within the presentation, and react based on the presentation, or their interpretation of the presentation. And yet, the wide range of information available, from such a wide range of sources, is also a strength. One must take the time to separate the wheat from the chaff.