Goldendragon7
Grandmaster
Originally posted by jdmills
I studied under Joe Palanzo back in 1987. He was a 7th at the time.
Jim
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by jdmills
I studied under Joe Palanzo back in 1987. He was a 7th at the time.
Jim
Originally posted by jdmills
I studied under Joe Palanzo back in 1987. He was a 7th at the time. Jim
Originally posted by Roland
...he gave Frank Trejo a 10th last year sometime now. Frank decided not to wear it, same as Tom Kelly.
Originally posted by jdmills
I've heard that Ed Parker did not even like belt ranks in the (very) early days. Can anyone confirm or deny?
Jim
I think that I had mentioned before, Mr. Parker didn't even wear stripes until seventh. When he began to expand into the commercial area, many began to receive rank over time for many of the reasons already mentioned. It than became important for Ed Parker to display his rank relative to students who were now wearing theirs. For him to not would diminish those who did. You'd be surprized how big a deal it became to wear his stripes when taking pictures with students. I don't wear striped belts and neither do my students but, whenever I go to take a picture with a visitor in uniform or at a seminar, they always ask for the "other belt." I don't like it because I think it should be about me the man and my skill and knowledge, but I do understand having gone through that transition with my own black belts, who had to be weened from the markings. They still want me to wear the stripes in magazine articles, and of course that means they can wear theirs.Originally posted by SingingTiger
From page 97 of Mr. Parker's "Infinite Insights, vol. 1", published in 1982:
"I will now attempt to justify the merits of the BELT RANKING SYSTEM which I was greatly opposed to during my early years of teaching. As long as a system, whatever the system might be, properly categorizes all of its basic elements into a systematic and progressive order, where one precept can build upon the other, then and then alone can they direct their system into proper graduating levels."
Rich
Originally posted by Doc
I don't like it because I think it should be about me the man and my skill and knowledge
Originally posted by jdmills
I agree.
In the late 80's I attended a seminar that was by Benny Urquidez. Someone asked him what degree black belt he was. Mr. Urquidez laughed and said that there were good black belts and bad black belts, and that we needed to judge for ourselves which of those categories any given individual fell in.
Benny Urquidez later gave a very brief synopsis of his credentials (beginning I think with studying wrestling when he was 4). I believe that he was trying to say that he had studied so many different styles of martial arts that his style was difficult to classify. After he was done with the synopsis, he said "so, what would you call me?" I think the black belt standing behind put it best when he spontaneously responded - "Sir".
That's a great story, and it sounds just like Benny.Originally posted by jdmills
I agree.
In the late 80's I attended a seminar that was by Benny Urquidez. Someone asked him what degree black belt he was. Mr. Urquidez laughed and said that there were good black belts and bad black belts, and that we needed to judge for ourselves which of those categories any given individual fell in.
Benny Urquidez later gave a very brief synopsis of his credentials (beginning I think with studying wrestling when he was 4). I believe that he was trying to say that he had studied so many different styles of martial arts that his style was difficult to classify. After he was done with the synopsis, he said "so, what would you call me?" I think the black belt standing behind put it best when he spontaneously responded - "Sir".
Originally posted by Doc
That's a great story, and it sounds just like Benny.
Originally posted by Wes Idol
There are letters between Pick and Parker that are quite private, but well describe how Pick quit the IKKA for a short time, but then him and Parker mended their fence. Also, I've seen another letter typed and signed (not stamped) by Ed Parker in the late 1980's. Parker states that Pick started at age 10 in 1957, and continues as a student to today. Also Parker refers to Pick as one of his most proficient, humble and longest standing students on the mats.
In the mid the late 90's many people approached Pick and thought he should put on a 10th...Pick would only do it by someone who was his senior...that means Tuiolosega, or Sullivan. After which time that Tuiolosega kicked Pick, Pick put down the bottle for good and believed he had a great responsibility put before him...to teach and behave as an example for others in training. If you talk to his son, Michael Jr. will testify how much has changed for the good in his Father, since Pick Sr. accepted this responsibility.
Lastly, I was there many nights before and the night of Pick kicking Trejo. Pick by no means was using Trejo for anything. Pick simply thought that Trejo has offered up so much of his body and spirit to this art, it was time. Pick has never brought it up again, nor has he asked Trejo to do anything but to just continue being Trejo.
On a final note, I know Trejo very well. If anyone tells you that he would allow anyone to use him for their own political posturing by way a 10th black promotion...that person probably doesn't know Trejo very well. Lastly, Trejo and Pick have a very old and long standing relationship...if you knew of it, as I do, you would never assume such a happening.
Respectfully,
WI, HI
UKS