Well even if I made a list of 50 there would still be missing options...I tried to cover the most common ones.Your list is quite odd too. Lot of options missing...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well even if I made a list of 50 there would still be missing options...I tried to cover the most common ones.Your list is quite odd too. Lot of options missing...
When faced with an obvious intent to physical harm.And then of course, there's the obvious question of how you define a "fight:" is it a mugging, or simply a difference of opinion gone wrong?
Well even if I made a list of 50 there would still be missing options...I tried to cover the most common ones.
I think there is such a thing as an *instinctive response* based on training yes.And the way you are addressing it, it would seem like you believe that you can only use the "stereotypical" martial art; boxers can only punch, taekwondoists can only kick, judoka can only grapple, etc.
Its really no more difficult to assess than listing the most common forms of weather.Most common from what source?
Several people have replied to this thread with a similar 'any which way I can' answer...but in choosing any particular martial art you have already limited your options and already chosen a particular way to win.
On the other hand, if you choose to carry no weapon, the range of 'any which way I can' becomes a lot narrower.
Several people have replied to this thread with a similar 'any which way I can' answer...but in choosing any particular martial art you have already limited your options and already chosen a particular way to win.
That of course assumes you do martial arts for self defense and not for sport.
Some people for example chose to become proficient at shooting handguns, and that will henceforth be their preferred method of survival.
It covers a wide range of circumstances, but if you kill someone the courts could rule it as an excessive use of force.
On the other hand, if you choose to carry no weapon, the range of 'any which way I can' becomes a lot narrower.
This is not a thread about whether you will win a real fight on the street...but HOW you want to win.
Here are some pros and cons as I see it.
Feel free to critique the following list.
1. Win by throwing to the ground...your opponent might get the wind knocked out of them, or might just reach out and grab your legs, kick your knee joint, or simply get up and attack you again.
2. Win by joint locking...your opponent might have friends waiting nearby who could easily take advantage. Two against one on the ground always wins.
3. Win by joint dislocating...cant think of a single disadvantage.
4. Win by knock out strike with hands...if your hands arent conditioned you might break knuckles.
5. Win by knock out strike with feet...slow, unbalanced, risky.
6. Win by slashing knife wound...could land you in deep legal dodo.
7. Win by stabbing knife wound...your opponent might be able to keep fighting for another 20 seconds...see above.
8. Win by gunshot wound...see above.
9. Win by blunt force weapon (such as a billy club/baton)...preferred by police, quick, accurate, almost perfect.
Context is important.When faced with an obvious intent to physical harm.
This is not a thread about whether you will win a real fight on the street...but HOW you want to win.
Alrighty then
I want to win by crushing my enemies, seeing them driven before me, and hearing the lamentations of their women. :samurai:
SNAP! :whip1:or men!
Alrighty then
I want to win by crushing my enemies, seeing them driven before me, and hearing the lamentations of their women. :samurai:
SNAP! :whip1:
or men!
I haven't found one.Even online we're being bossed around. Is no place safe anymore?