drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
Get rid of the person that can stop the match, then you would be closer to reality.
Not for me. I stop when a person can no longer defend themselves or are no longer a threat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get rid of the person that can stop the match, then you would be closer to reality.
Sure, but what if they don't stop when you can no longer defend yourself or are no longer a threat?Not for me. I stop when a person can no longer defend themselves or are no longer a threat.
I have.But do you run away in the streets then?
Sure, but what if they don't stop when you can no longer defend yourself or are no longer a threat?
I don't think it's unreasonable to consider the referee as a safety feature.
I always did as well. My very first kickboxing match, I was about 26 years old. The poor kid I was to fight was eighteen, his first kickboxing match as well. And he was scared shipless.Not for me. I stop when a person can no longer defend themselves or are no longer a threat.
Sure, but what if they don't stop when you can no longer defend yourself or are no longer a threat?
I don't think it's unreasonable to consider the referee as a safety feature.
That's good, but there is no real danger when a ref is involved.Not for me. I stop when a person can no longer defend themselves or are no longer a threat.
No, no they are not, what they do know...is that there is no real danger when they fight.That's absurd.
Sports fighters are already trying to kill each other when the round starts. How is that not reality?
While it's true that competitors aren't actually trying to murder each other, it's incorrect to say there is no real danger when a ref is involved. The danger is, assuredly, greatly reduced. But it is by no means eliminated. That's like saying there is no real danger driving a car at 200MPH around a track, as long as you wear your seat belt.No, no they are not, what they do know...is that there is no real danger when they fight.
If you have a ref, you are absolutely not in any real danger. Unless, and this is rare, you have an idiot ref.
Your brain knows you are safe, when there is a ref involved.
I would disagree. If there is someone there to stop the fight, you are not concerned, as much, with losing your life. The ref insures that a life will not be lost. Without a ref, you do not have a cushion of safety surrounding your life.While it's true that competitors aren't actually trying to murder each other, it's incorrect to say there is no real danger when a ref is involved. The danger is, assuredly, greatly reduced. But it is by no means eliminated. That's like saying there is no real danger driving a car at 200MPH around a track, as long as you wear your seat belt.
I don't see why you would...I would disagree.
These two statements are contradictory. In the first one, you agree with me, immediately after saying you disagree. And the latter one is just plain wrong. The ref reduces the risk; they do not by any means eliminate it.If there is someone there to stop the fight, you are not concerned, as much, with losing your life. The ref insures that a life will not be lost.
True enough. While training accidents happen, they are accidents. The danger was intended to be minimized.2. All armies of the world train without real danger.
All of them.1. What percentage of street fights are the "kill or be killed" fights?
Then you should have posted my agreement as well.I don't see why you would...
These two statements are contradictory. In the first one, you agree with me, immediately after saying you disagree. And the latter one is just plain wrong. The ref reduces the risk; they do not by any means eliminate it.
I mean, you do understand that people are killed or crippled by sports on a regular basis, yes?
If there is someone there to stop the fight, you are not concerned, as much, with losing your life.
I did. But I can quote it again. Do you really not understand the difference between eliminating risk and reducing it? Because right there, in your own words, you're agreeing that a ref reduces risk. They do not eliminate it.Then you should have posted my agreement as well.
That's good, but there is no real danger when a ref is involved.
Most sane people can stop themselves, it would be abnormal, if a person could not.
No, no they are not, what they do know...is that there is no real danger when they fight.
If you have a ref, you are absolutely not in any real danger. Unless, and this is rare, you have an idiot ref.
Your brain knows you are safe, when there is a ref involved.
All of them.
If it's not worth killing or dying for; then you shouldn't be fighting at all.