you have no time to launch the right
Why is that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you have no time to launch the right
You three jumped on the thread and strated trolling. If you don't use man wu then why are you even here? Conversation was going fine without you.
---So now trying to participate and make sense out of one of your technical discussions....at your invitation....is considered "trolling"???
how about leaving the thread to people who actually might be interested instead?
---That's probably the best thing you've written in a LONG time. Although, I can't see why anyone would be interested in these long convoluted discussions with you two that always seem to go nowhere except down the rabbit hole.
I don't really care. If your method is based on contemplating riddles and hypothetical scenarios, I don't want anything to do with it.
Thing is I actually am interested, the thing is I was never taught that being interested meant that one can't look at things critically and voice an observation/opinion
We've already discussed how I don't use Man Sau-Wu Sau. I agreed with LFJ on his deduction that this method gets you hit. In that exact scenario, if using Man Sau-Wu Sau, my suggestion was brace for the hit, no stopping it. However, it still doesn't solve how WSLPB VT would defend it from that position. How would you if you were in the exact scenario using Man Sau-Wu Sau as described?For WT hands on centre this is the case
That's why not to do as WT does
It's right here on the thread. Maybe try listening instead of talking?
Where is your wu hand?
How would you respond if you were in that exact scenario using Man Sau-Wu Sau as described? That's the question you've been ignoring.
You're the one arguing and not listening. LFJ and I came to an agreement, at least I did with him. I'm not looking for vindication or anything. You are the one arguing my conclusion to the hypothetical situation that was given. It's get hit, my response, take it. It cant be avoided. I'm throwing the question back to you. Answer or don't.What a drama queen. If you are intersted then try listening. If not interested then simply stop worrying about it.
I agree, but you've been arguing with me on the premise that I was using that and if I were the answer is cover, cause you're going to get hit. If you were to be in the exact scenario using Man Sau -Wu Sau what is the response?We don't use it as described, that is why the situation was framed to show the problems with using as described.
you've been arguing with me on the premise that I was using that and if I were the answer is cover,
Whatever, thanks.It took you pages and pages to realise that it was a situation for Geezer. Since you don't hold your hands that way then no reason to even be in the discussion. Not sure why still here?
What's kinda frustrating is that it is still applicable, here is the line of logic...Whatever, thanks.
Whatever, thanks.
I don't need to "sit on" anything. You are not my teacher. Just give direct responses.
In Pin Sun we don't use an extended "ready position" like that. I was just trying to participate in the parameters of YOUR scenario. But it seems you keep changing it to suit yourself.
It seems the original scenario that started the discussion in this direction keeps changing. Looks like LFJ designed a scenario that had no good answer and then you both sit back and laugh at people that try to give an answer, all the while not saying what you would do yourself. But the answer to that question seems to be..."don't be in that situation to begin with!" Which is a horribly disingenuous way to drive a discussion!
---So now trying to participate and make sense out of one of your technical discussions....at your invitation....is considered "trolling"???
you outlining a scenario, other people trying to take part by describing what they would do in such a scenario, you essentially laughing at them and telling them how wrong they are, and you yourself never stating what you would do in the same scenario.
In the SNT thread Guy asked us several times to participate in THIS thread, so yeah, we were invited.
What's the old saying about arguing with an idiot?
I believe that "to get the wrong end of the stick" an actual substantive response needs to be delivered. The responses we have gotten have amounted to "WSLVT is superior and you are wrong."LFJ is correct. The last 12 pages or so could be deleted because they consist of nothing more than NI, KPM and Juany getting the wrong end of the stick, arguing with anything and everything, concluding (very slowly) that the situation doesn't apply to their mainland crab guard, and then stomping off in the huff.
Very odd behaviour.
If you had studied the system, you would know these basics. So either you aren't telling the truth or somehow you missed the fundamentals. Confusing.
I believe that "to get the wrong end of the stick" an actual substantive response needs to be delivered. The responses we have gotten have amounted to "WSLVT is superior and you are wrong."
I do understand the basics you speak of...
...It seems that, in your mind, having knowledge of WSLVT by definition means that one must also believe in its inherent superiority thus if someone doesn't recognize the superiority one must have no knowledge.
I do understand the basics you speak of. In this thread I haven't made any comment saying "this is what WSLVT does." First I simply compared two videos, WSL himself and a video of a student of PB. Next I stated that, in the specific proposed scenario (not in a global sense) I believe there are methods that exist in other WC Lineages that have a higher like good of success.
It seems that, in your mind, having knowledge of WSLVT by definition means that one must also believe in its inherent superiority thus if someone doesn't recognize the superiority one must have no knowledge.
That kind of circular logic is the essence of most of the arguments, and I use that term loosely, that you make.