Juany118
Senior Master
This is truth. When I mention my teacher, it's for a similar reason to you. He could teach Panda Style Kung Fu (sorry just watched the new movie with my God Son lol) but he is an excellent teacher who puts WC and Kali in the context of real world Law Enforcement encounters. When I mention his WC Sifu (who I also occasionally train under) the only reason I mention the closed door William Cheung thing is to is to explain that in terms of general TWC methodology he knows it, beyond that the real reason I mention him is because he is a combatives Subject Matter Expert for not just the DoJ but a number of US Military organizations including the U.S. Naval Special Warfare Command and the U.S. Army Special Operations Command.I'm more interested in what works than in old photos. Or even in whether something was done by GM Yip, WSL, or anybody else.
As my first Escrima instructor, Rene Latosa used to say, "Nobody cares who you learned from, it's what you can do". Unfortunately, too many people do worry too much about names and certificates rather than what you can do, ...and how well you can teach it. One of my current coaches never got a "black belt" in anything, but he has real skill as a fighter and is a very good coach. Many of his students do have very high ranks in various arts.
I study with them because of their knowledge, experience and teaching ability.
There is another element though which I think is also missed. The experience of my teachers only provides me with the potential to grow as an practical martial artist. In the final equation the buck stops at the practitioner's door. Avoiding that by endless harkening back to a master who is dead to justify your knowledge or potential for success misses one of the main the points of studying MA imo, personal growth.