Where did you get from that post that Judo is a watered down version of any of those?So why not learn Jujitsu instead? better yet, learn BJJ and wrestling instead? Why learn the water down version?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did you get from that post that Judo is a watered down version of any of those?So why not learn Jujitsu instead? better yet, learn BJJ and wrestling instead? Why learn the water down version?
And in UFC you don't have to worry about awareness of one's surroundings, you don't have to worry about reading a crowd, you'll never have to worry about the possibility of a weapon being pulled on you. So no "UFC" is not good for self defense.UFC sure show what is useful and what is not. Like I said, even if you only train in weight lifting, it's better than someone that doesn't know anything in self defense. That does NOT mean weight training is good for self defense.
If you take up traditional Jujitsu then you would be doing a lot of cooperative regiments similar to a two person Kata, you would be learning about weapons as well many flourishy pleasing to the eye techniques, Judo removed that and fixated on only techniques that work on someone fighting against you.So why not learn Jujitsu instead? better yet, learn BJJ and wrestling instead? Why learn the water down version?
Judo teach you awareness of surroundings?And in UFC you don't have to worry about awareness of one's surroundings, you don't have to worry about reading a crowd, you'll never have to worry about the possibility of a weapon being pulled on you. So no "UFC" is not good for self defense.
If you take up traditional Jujitsu then you would be doing a lot of cooperative regiments similar to a two person Kata, you would be learning about weapons as well many flourishy pleasing to the eye techniques, Judo removed that and fixated on only techniques that work on someone fighting against you.
Judo is watered down in the sense of it removed what wasn't applicable to fighting outside of feudal Japan.
Read who I reply to.Where did you get from that post that Judo is a watered down version of any of those?
That depends on the kind of Judo you are learning. If it is strictly Olympic Judo which is IJF then no it wouldn't. If it is Kodokan Judo then that is more self defense oriented.Judo teach you awareness of surroundings?
If one is choosing what to learn, why not BJJ or wrestling that is complete and proved to be effective?
Exactly how are BJJ and Wrestling "Complete?" They both lack many useful techniques. Tell me how well a wrestler can throw a spinning back kick. How well can a jujitsero throw a straight?Judo teach you awareness of surroundings?
If one is choosing what to learn, why not BJJ or wrestling that is complete and proved to be effective?
You should look up the history of the BJJ move: the Kimura. BJJ calls a reverse ude-garami, a Kimura, in respect for the Judo player named Masahiko Kimura. Kimura took a challenge match with Helio Gracie (the founder of BJJ) and after throwing him repeatedly, submitted him with a reverse ude-garami, breaking Helio's arm. So which one is effective?If one is choosing what to learn, why not BJJ or wrestling that is complete and proved to be effective?
I think UFC and all MMA people will disagree with you. Can judo throw a spin back kick or straight?Exactly how are BJJ and Wrestling "Complete?" They both lack many useful techniques. Tell me how well a wrestler can throw a spinning back kick. How well can a jujitsero throw a straight?
I never said Judo is a complete art. You however said BJJ is.I think UFC and all MMA people will disagree with you. Can judo throw a spin back kick or straight?
Yes, BJJ and wrestling is proven in the Octagon for years. They are not perfect, that's why MMA combine Tae Kwon Do kicks, boxing hands, wrestling and BJJ together.
To use the term, "real fight" and judoka would seem to be intellectually incongruent. Although essentially anything can be converted to some type of martial activity, Judo itself by design is not a fighting art persé and therefore is immediately handicapped by its own creative purposes. Designed as a "sporting activity" that begins any resemblance of combat with adversaries grabbing each other's tops or clothes and then attempting to throw and leverage your opponent to the ground for points and/or "pins," would seem to belie a "street fight" tendency to begin with some type of striking. Adding to the equation the question of female versus male exacerbates the problem because of differences in body mass. Probably more than any other martial activity judo recognizes the discrepancies in weight between opponents in general and particularly between males and females. Its creator, Jiguro Kano, recognized that and because advancement requires "randori" or Judo sparring, he purposely did several things. He created the popular belt ranking system used by most today that separated participants by skill level. But he went further as well and divided them into general weight classes, and separated males from females for a reason. Body mass matters in Judo. I'm reminded of a story I read in Black Belt Magazine back in the sixties. There was a famous Judo Master who had a young student who outweighed him by over 100 pounds. The master was very honest when asked the question, "how do you randori him?" He essentially said, "I can't do anything. I can't sweep him, I can't throw him. All he does is when we clinch he just falls down and I'm pinned. He doesn't have to do much of anything." I think somewhere in there lies the answer to a not so well thought out question with too many variables that fall in the man's favor to be answered seriously.Is judo effective in a real fight? Who would win if an elite female judoka (105lb) against a bigger untrained guy (150lb) in a real fight?
I don't think it's as stark a line as all that. The OP was stated as an elite female Judoka vs. an untrained male of below-average weight (150 lbs., so 25 lbs. less than me, and I'm not a big guy). That 45lbs. difference is an advantage, but is likley offset by the Judoka's experience, which almost certainly includes randori against men bigger than her. Meanwhile, the untrained guy almost certainly has no experience working against a competent Judoka, so hasn't any functional grappling defense if she gets inside.To use the term, "real fight" and judoka would seem to be intellectually incongruent. Although essentially anything can be converted to some type of martial activity, Judo itself by design is not a fighting art persé and therefore is immediately handicapped by its own creative purposes. Designed as a "sporting activity" that begins any resemblance of combat with adversaries grabbing each other's tops or clothes and then attempting to throw and leverage your opponent to the ground for points and/or "pins," would seem to belie a "street fight" tendency to begin with some type of striking. Adding to the equation the question of female versus male exacerbates the problem because of differences in body mass. Probably more than any other martial activity judo recognizes the discrepancies in weight between opponents in general and particularly between males and females. Its creator, Jiguro Kano, recognized that and because advancement requires "randori" or Judo sparring, he purposely did several things. He created the popular belt ranking system used by most today that separated participants by skill level. But he went further as well and divided them into general weight classes, and separated males from females for a reason. Body mass matters in Judo. I'm reminded of a story I read in Black Belt Magazine back in the sixties. There was a famous Judo Master who had a young student who outweighed him by over 100 pounds. The master was very honest when asked the question, "how do you randori him?" He essentially said, "I can't do anything. I can't sweep him, I can't throw him. All he does is when we clinch he just falls down and I'm pinned. He doesn't have to do much of anything." I think somewhere in there lies the answer to a not so well thought out question with too many variables that fall in the man's favor to be answered seriously.
I did. None of that reply indicated judo was a watered down version of any of those arts (and actually only mentioned one of the arts).Read who I reply to.
Read one more time.I did. None of that reply indicated judo was a watered down version of any of those arts (and actually only mentioned one of the arts).
Much more complete, watch Royce Gracie. Watch the first year or two of UFC, dominated by BJJ and wrestling. They really didn't strike much. Took people a long time to solve the ground game puzzle.I never said Judo is a complete art. You however said BJJ is.
Is judo effective in a real fight? Who would win if an elite female judoka (105lb) against a bigger untrained guy (150lb) in a real fight?
105 pounds lol?Is judo effective in a real fight? Who would win if an elite female judoka (105lb) against a bigger untrained guy (150lb) in a real fight?
No matter how many times he reads it, it won't say something it doesn't say.Read one more time.
Which again isn't self defense.Much more complete, watch Royce Gracie. Watch the first year or two of UFC, dominated by BJJ and wrestling. They really didn't strike much. Took people a long time to solve the ground game puzzle.
I did. Still not seeing it. Can you point where he said it in the post you replied to?Read one more time.