All martial arts are artificial. All were created by a human being and since all human beings (excluding me) are imperfect than logic states that all martial arts are imperfect. But, like the humans, some arts are better than others.
Why anyone would want the term 'complete' attached to their art is beyond me. If it is completed no growth is allowed. I studied Hapkido for a short period of time and upon learning joint manipulation I was thrilled at being able to have new 'toys' to tear apart to see how they worked and what else I could do with them. I approached my instructor and shared some of my concepts with him and He said "We don't allow that in Hapkido because students break away and create their own arts." In my opinion that is a complete system. The words "Dead End" have appeared on their road and they've gone as far as they can. Is this a good thing? Are the martial arts something that we want to have a conclusion or a concept of completion attached to?
I don't, but that's just me...
Why anyone would want the term 'complete' attached to their art is beyond me. If it is completed no growth is allowed. I studied Hapkido for a short period of time and upon learning joint manipulation I was thrilled at being able to have new 'toys' to tear apart to see how they worked and what else I could do with them. I approached my instructor and shared some of my concepts with him and He said "We don't allow that in Hapkido because students break away and create their own arts." In my opinion that is a complete system. The words "Dead End" have appeared on their road and they've gone as far as they can. Is this a good thing? Are the martial arts something that we want to have a conclusion or a concept of completion attached to?
I don't, but that's just me...