Yes.I don't even know where to begin with this.
Yes.You're trying to use my logic against me, but it doesn't fit this situation, so it just makes you look silly.
I assumed his response was the same as mine-that your statement was so ridiculous it was pointless continuing discussing. No emotions involved.Someone does not need to say "I'm offended" to clearly be offended with something. His response (which you liked, so I know you saw it) clearly implied that he was unhappy with what I was saying.
You misunderstood my response then, as I was not weighing in on that at all. Nor do I particularly care. My viewpoint, as it has always been across multiple threads, is that if someone defines a word in a thread, when discussing with that person (not when they seem to just want an semantical argument, but an actual discussion), I will use their definition for the purposes of discussion.Your response suggests you're also offended that I would dare say that "trained with" has no requirements on whether it was once, many, or over the course of time.
I'm not coming to his defense. He doesn't need me to come to his defense. I also fail to see how my post was aggressive.But let's even say you are correct, and he wasn't offended. Then what's the point of coming to his defense, if I'm not being offensive? If you are correct, and he wasn't offended, why do you need to be so aggressive?
I wouldn't even call this an argument. I gave up on that after your goalpost statement.You're a moderator on a martial arts forum, but you've been reduced to arguing like a teenager. On top of that, it wasn't even your argument!