Calling Somebody's Dojo A McDojo Is Offensive

Whoa, hold on. Not quite true. It really depends upon whether the statements are supported by some objective, independently observed standards. For example, it should be pretty easy to determine whether food is greasy or not.
The context is that greasy is a bad thing. And that is a matter of taste. Some people like lean meat. Some like it heavily marbled.
 
Well duh...who said they didn’t ?
an opinion isn’t the same as trying to act as a licensed lawyer and I’ve been right over a dr more then once when it came to diagnosis

it wasn’t because they weren’t smart, it was because they didn’t do the test to actually confirm the truth...a specialist confirmed it

would I say the multiple doctors were bad? No but I’d still say my ex dr was bad as his negligence almost caused a death...so you’re wrong again, I mean if my opinion does t matter in the medical world how could I file complaints or a lawsuit
Please reread your last line in the above quote.
 
I did post it, you said you don’t care who I defame etc...ok give an example of one dojo I defamed
You have reliably demonstrated your inability to discuss in a cogent manner. I am really not interested in continuing this discussion with you today. The lack of marbling in your responses, while tender, is rather flavorless.
 
Whoa, hold on. Not quite true. It really depends upon whether the statements are supported by some objective, independently observed standards. For example, it should be pretty easy to determine whether food is greasy or not.
Whether that’s bad, though, is subjective. There’s a place in my hometown known for being greasy. People come from other states to go there.
 
Whether that’s bad, though, is subjective. There’s a place in my hometown known for being greasy. People come from other states to go there.
Can you say "Heart Attack Grill"?
1641949279908.webp

Or the Big Texan?
1641949232081.webp


These are not things I would choose to eat.
 
Whoa, hold on. Not quite true. It really depends upon whether the statements are supported by some objective, independently observed standards. For example, it should be pretty easy to determine whether food is greasy or not.

Steve,

As an engineer I see and understand your point.
I have Gilbert's which is a genetic Liver disorder. To most people it is no big deal for me it is more so.

I can eat white meat chicken or Turkey, but I cannot have it with the skin or even eat Dark meat without feeling discomfort.
So to some a baked chicken leg would not be greasy, and to me it is. :(

Another example is vehicle emissions. a vehicle that was considered Low Emissions for 2000, probably today would not even be considered to pass any emission test. So it is subjective to the time place and location and the environment, on if the vehicle meets low emissions.
That being said, the 2000 vehicle would or should still meet the emissions it was designed for. So low or greasy are too vague a definition. :(
One would have to quantify the exact CO, CO2, NO, NO2, and non Methane, and particulates to measure.

So I see your point as I stated. Just in general discussion most (very few) will discuss in details the level of details required for an absolute such as that.
I dislike this post , so if you feel bad about it I understand. I don't mean it as a negative. Just explaining my subjective understanding of this topic.
My Apologies.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top