punisher73
Senior Master
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2004
- Messages
- 3,959
- Reaction score
- 1,062
http://msn.foxsports.com/other/stor...d-from-girls-varsity-field-hockey-team-042612
Thought this was an interesting article. So, do you think that since there is no equivalent of a boy's team that he should be allowed to play? What about all the girl's who have to be allowed on the boys teams when there is not an equivalent sport (football, wrestling for example). Or do we REALLY get down to what people don't want to say about gender equality? Basically, the rule states that a boy can play a girl sport as long as he's not too good. Or translation, we will let girls play football and wrestling because they won't be good enough to change the dynamic of the sport, but if we allow boy's to play they will be better than the girls and overtake the sport. Which isn't gender equality at all.
Thought this was an interesting article. So, do you think that since there is no equivalent of a boy's team that he should be allowed to play? What about all the girl's who have to be allowed on the boys teams when there is not an equivalent sport (football, wrestling for example). Or do we REALLY get down to what people don't want to say about gender equality? Basically, the rule states that a boy can play a girl sport as long as he's not too good. Or translation, we will let girls play football and wrestling because they won't be good enough to change the dynamic of the sport, but if we allow boy's to play they will be better than the girls and overtake the sport. Which isn't gender equality at all.