Miles
Senior Master
Miles, what about WTK Taekwondo where the body shots are judged on impact and you can win by knock out. The whole intent there is to injury, hurt or put the other player out of commission so that they can not continue. It is not a case of assault and battery it is 2 players fighting full contact TKD. If you put a touch football player in a game with players wearing pads and used to hitting are they then wrong to nail the touch foot ball player who wants to play with them? No, they are just playing under different rules, the same as in the martial arts. If the full contact players went to a non/light contact tournament and went all out then he would be wrong but in WTF TKD if you are not hitting with the intent to injure (within the context of the rules that govern WTF TKD) then you are not playing the game the way it should be played and you really need to go somewhere else that is a safer place to play. This is just my opinion, of course.
Wade, I think I understand where you are coming from, but in sparring, there is what we lawyers call "assumption of risk." There is no intent to injure, but there is an understanding that due to the nature of the activity, that someone could get knocked out (heck, there was that Dutch player who died a few years back). As you mention, the play is within the context of the rules-I still think that you can play to win without the intent to injure (which if you have that intent, there is no respect for your opponent).
I am not talking about hard blocking (which I totally believe in and teach). I am thinking more like using a cut kick to the opponent's knee-something that is clearly not allowed under the rules.
Sean, if we agree to disagree that is fine, I wanted to understand your point as we may be coming at this from different perspectives.
Miles