Doc
Senior Master
The Chinese taught and information was passed through demonstrated and posed physical expressions, laced with flowery metaphors and substitute euphemisms. Coupled together for students, this enhanced the learning process and gave a point of reference for very sophisticated scientific physical applications. They often used animal references (real and mythical) for references, because 'how' a creature moved is something that could actually be observed and/or understood.Kenpobuff said:Doc, GD7 or anyone else:
Was Mr. Parker the first to put a name to all the basics in order to complete the "motion sentences" or did the Japanese and Chinese do the same as they developed their techniques and forms for reference sake?
Mr. Parker borrowed naming basics and techniques from the Chinese, choosing to use descriptive standard and consistent English Terminology to explain 'basics.' He did opt however to maintain the 'flowery' metaphors, etc in the naming of techniques for the same reason the Chinese did. It makes them easier to remember.
A hand position called "Eye of the Phoenix" is an example of a basic hand position. This position caused a wrinkle in the second joint of the index finger that resembled the eye of a bird as a reference. This particular reference was used and illustrated in Mr. Parkers second book, "Secrets of Chinese Karate" along with another example, "Twin Dragons after the Pearl."
Although these specific references appear on the surface to be unnecessary or excessive, (Mr. Parker received the same ignorant criticism), these hand positions actually have significant implications as to the structure of the entire body, as do every part of the human body. The change of a single finger position can have a profound effect positive or negative on human anatomical efficiency. Move a finger incorrectly and your body can become incapable of supporting a solidified base. Move it another way, and you become 'rock solid.' Ummmmm, there we go with the metaphors again.
For various reasons the Japanese and Okinawans did not grasp the significance of this finite method of passing scientific information, and opted instead to teach from the "tradition persepetive" which translates to "do it this way because I said so." Now there is nothing wrong with this cultural method that doesn't allow students to ask questions, as long as the teacher knows what he's talking about. But then, without the ability to ask questions, how would you know? This method is common because most teachers are unknowledgeable, and it masks their lack of knowledge by not having to entertain questions from curious students of all ages. Then there are others that feel compelled to 'always have an answer,' and instead come up with some really weird stuff. I heard a high raking instructor, (who will remain nameless) at a camp in Vegas, suggest on a strike that you must "synchronize your movement with the rotational effect of the earth." No, I'm not kidding and neither was he. .