And the Constitution is good enough for me when it comes to defense. We don't live in a free market yet, so we need the state for some things at the moment.
Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bob, the alternative is total collapse. You will lose all your liberty and all of your property. It will be fed to the beast. We have no choice but to cut the guns and butter state deep and yeah its going to hurt, but that's the price we'll have to pay. There is no way around it unless you want to give up your freedom and property.
Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
The collapse will lead to more government. And I'm not saying we don't need any guns. We just need to downsize big time and end the empire. How much does China spend on defense?
Downsizing won't lead to anything but more wealth and freedom for us all.
That isn't, btw, the $20per hour "Living wage"...Apply at http://www.workingfamiliesparty.org/jobs/.
- Compensation: $350-$650 A Week Depending On Responsibility & Length Of Time On Staff
- Principals only. Recruiters, please don't contact this job poster.
- Please, no phone calls about this job!
- Please do not contact job poster about other services, products or commercial interests.
PostingID: 2618821815
I'm withholding the smart *** remarks... for nowI'm unaware that there's a quota set for 41 yr old geeks from WNY who like shooting hot chicks in their underwear and bragging about it on web forums.
There is not and never has been an American Empire.Being released from the tax burden of empire,
**** *** *** ******** ****American citizens would prosper like never before. The threat from terrorism would drop because our foreign policy is no longer creating terrorists.
Which, conservatives said was completely unnecessary.Entire departments could be dismantled, starting with homeland security
Which conservatives said was completely unnecessaryand propaganda....err I mean education.
Productive sectors of the economy would build rather being flushed down the blowing stuff up hole. Cutting defense is the first step toward a new American renaissance.
Your thoughts on wealth probably need a new thread. They are checked by the system of currency we use now, though. It's limited by definition.
I'm back. It was fun. Gave lots of lefties and righties earfulls.
Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
There is not and never has been an American Empire.
That guy, and apparently a poster or two, and some of the assorted nutjobs are the only ones who believe that.Tell that to his Imperial Majesty Emperor Norton I, "Emperor of these United States" and "Protector of Mexico".
There is not and never has been an American Empire.
Country | Year 2000 CEO compensation as a multiple of average employee compensation* |
US | 531 |
Brazil | 57 |
Venezuela | 54 |
South Africa | 51 |
Argentina | 48 |
Malaysia | 47 |
Mexico | 45 |
Hong Kong | 38 |
Singapore | 37 |
Britain | 25 |
Thailand | 23 |
Australia | 22 |
Netherlands | 22 |
Canada | 21 |
China (Shanghai) | 21 |
Belgium | 19 |
Italy | 19 |
Spain | 18 |
New Zealand | 16 |
France | 16 |
Taiwan | 15 |
Sweden | 14 |
Germany | 11 |
South Korea | 11 |
Switzerland | 11 |
Japan | 10 |
Yeah, that is the type of WRONG math you're using, We know.2+2=5
Sent from my Eris using Tapatalk
QFT and amplificationIt was government involvement that caused the depression we're in, and it's government involvement that is causing it to last past the normal 2-3 year period.
They have
1 flooded the economy with more money, trillions of dollars. Result, higher prices.
2 bailed out 'cant fail' businesses. Result, higher debt, businesses still screwing up.
3 Allowed other businesses to fail. Result, displaced workers.
4 2 + 3 equals interference in the normal righting process, delaying the redistribution of resources needed to right the economy naturally.
5 paid out multiple 'stimuluses'. Result, short term ease, long term debt.
6 taken control of numerous companies. Result, government is now in the banking, investment, loan and auto industries. Unconstitutional. Further interference delaying the normal correction.
As to CEO earnings, here's a few questions:
- Why is no one marching on the NFL to bring Quarterback pay into line too?
- Does a CEO earning $1B mean there is $1B less for you?
- How many of those CEO's make a pittance in salary, but earn nice bonuses if the company does well?
-- Would you want to work under the same terms? (Note, I do. My salary is $1 per year.)
- Do you really think that the 'rank and file' who 'works 9-5' deserve the same compensation as a CEO who may work 7 days a week and put in 12+ hour days?
- Should the US limit peoples ability to earn because other countries do too?
1 flooded the economy with more money, trillions of dollars. Result, higher prices.
Do you really think that the 'rank and file' who 'works 9-5' deserve the same compensation as a CEO who may work 7 days a week and put in 12+ hour days?
Prices are not uniformly higher. Core inflation is still very low - we were actually in a few quarters of deflation a while back. Cheap money is obviously not the reason for price hikes in certain sectors (i.e. energy and health).
I work 60+ hour weeks. Not rich either. I don't get paid when things suck either.This is just agitprop. The rich are rich because they are better people. You have no idea what average CEO working hours are. You can't point to one CEO like Bill Gates who famously worked long hours and then claim they all do. I work 80 hour weeks. Where is my $500 million if that's how it's supposed to work? CEOs also get paid when they fail spectacularly, not too many of us can claim that, no matter how hard we work.