drop bear
Sr. Grandmaster
Has anyone put any research into less damaging joint locks for pain compliance techniques for police?
I have played around with some stuff.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Has anyone put any research into less damaging joint locks for pain compliance techniques for police?
Talking is a free action.
You can always negotiate. It doesn't really cost you anything.
Putting a little force into a proper joint lock, puts that force directly into the lock itself. I have seen severe injuries to people trying to do this. The best way out of a joint lock is to relax and go with it, try to get a little ahead of it... so as to release the lock.I would personally consider retaliation in the same bracket as resistance. If you want to get out of the hold you need to put a little force into it which could be deemed retaliation.
That is apparent in your responses.(i haven't been doing any grappling to just get that out of the way)
Quite the opposite. If I am going for a joint lock, it is because I have decided for whatever reason, I do not want to cause severe injury or loss of consciousness. I want to control the other person and escort them out, put them in restraints, ask them to reconsider... whatever. If I want to cause injury or loss of consciousness, then any joint lock would be merely transitory, helping me to gain the position necessary to choke / knock out the other guy.Time for talking is over if someone is trying to put you in a joint lock. For both parties really.
the three stages of pain compliance are,, ow, oooooowwwwww and ******* **** that hurtsOk, so ive never been taught this directly per say but it seems to hold up well and im interested in how others learned/were taught about it? And if you have similar/unique examples.
0. Resistance
1. Compliance - to ease the pain they move how and were you want them
(generally a joint lock but not necessarily)
2. Retaliation - youve applied too much force, and they pain is so great they dont care about, and fight back
3. The Breaking Point - what ever your tugging, pushing, etc. breaks, snaps, etc. and they cant use it. they want to hold the area and usually comply to other force.
EX1
1. Ive demonstrated and felt a common hammer lock (like what police use) and have made people and been made to move where is pushed
2. Ive demonstrated and felt extra pressure and the urge and motion to want to retaliate, swing, kick, etc.
3. Ive NOT had the shoulder dislocated or done it to anyone but is painful, and awkward so i hear
EX2
1. Ive used and felt nose pull throws to their full effectiveness
2. Ive been hit in the nose (strikes and hard grappling bumps) that make me want to fight back harder
3. Ive broken someones nose and seen how quick people stop
Quite the opposite.
the three stages of pain compliance are,, ow, oooooowwwwww and ******* **** that hurts
No one has died from a wrist lock, elbow lock, or other come along hold. They may get spiral fractures, torn ligaments or dislocated joints... but not killed.You may not wish to kill them, but as soon as force is brought out, you need to actively stop it to stop it.
You need to watch a few episodes of Cops. They give very specific instructions to the bad guys, as they are trying to put the cuffs on. Some listen some don't. Some resist until the officer gets him down and his arms in a compromising position, then they become very compliant. Others require a dog pile. But every time, clear instructions are being given to the guy resisting.Not saying you cant talk while fighting* (not really talk, i don't think many people can focus that well on both to formulate good conversations) but you need to stop the force or apply it then take the following actions you deem fit. (if you are either the one being on the receiving end of a joint lock or giving one) The usage of talk in context implies no force needing to be resisted or applied. After all are you really talking your way out of it, if you have got someone in a choke hold and choking them while telling them to "stop"?
Sorry, but you should really get some experience before discussing this stuff. You would use the joint lock to break their structure and close distance, in order to take further action... not make more distance.The latter part kind of enthisises the need to stop the joint lock attempt and gain distance before you take either further action offensively
Just reiterating that this point in incorrect.Just to reiterate the point was, you need to apply the force or resist it before you can go back into the talking stage if you deem that as your follow up action.
Time for talking is over if someone is trying to put you in a joint lock. For both parties really.
@skribs Or i could have just been exaggerating my usage of words to make a point, or chose those words to make a point. Doesn't really prove or disprove anything. (i haven't been doing any grappling to just get that out of the way)
Please I have chatted with guys I have been choking.
You may not wish to kill them, but as soon as force is brought out, you need to actively stop it to stop it. Not saying you cant talk while fighting* (not really talk, i don't think many people can focus that well on both to formulate good conversations) but you need to stop the force or apply it then take the following actions you deem fit. (if you are either the one being on the receiving end of a joint lock or giving one) The usage of talk in context implies no force needing to be resisted or applied. After all are you really talking your way out of it, if you have got someone in a choke hold and choking them while telling them to "stop"?
The latter part kind of enthisises the need to stop the joint lock attempt and gain distance before you take either further action offensively, decide to try and talk them down or run off. So the person applying it cannot break the joint, get into another position you dont wish them to have for what ever reason.
If any of that needs elaborating or clarifying just tell me, reading back i can see its somewhat jumbly, just cant fix it without loosing the points i was trying to make. Woes of having a bad typing structure.
Just to reiterate the point was, you need to apply the force or resist it before you can go back into the talking stage if you deem that as your follow up action. If you are on the receiving end its more vital to stop the attempt to put you in said position of vulnerability. I also dont disagree the validity of the verbal component but when actually fighting, you need to actually apply the physical or fight it off to re enforce the verbal when it comes to it. Thats the point i tried to make at the * before i broke the structure to fit it in. The usage of words can help you sometimes, not all the time though, it can also get third parties in on your side if its a extended fight.
I also had no real comment on how to actually grapple, my usage of words was for literary effect. i would personally just punch what ever i can punch to try and break out of it as that's the only method i can do.
If you can have a conversation with them in clear English, someone has been doing something wrong.
You may not wish to kill them, but as soon as force is brought out, you need to actively stop it to stop it. Not saying you cant talk while fighting* (not really talk, i don't think many people can focus that well on both to formulate good conversations) but you need to stop the force or apply it then take the following actions you deem fit. (if you are either the one being on the receiving end of a joint lock or giving one) The usage of talk in context implies no force needing to be resisted or applied. After all are you really talking your way out of it, if you have got someone in a choke hold and choking them while telling them to "stop"?
The latter part kind of enthisises the need to stop the joint lock attempt and gain distance before you take either further action offensively, decide to try and talk them down or run off. So the person applying it cannot break the joint, get into another position you dont wish them to have for what ever reason.
If any of that needs elaborating or clarifying just tell me, reading back i can see its somewhat jumbly, just cant fix it without loosing the points i was trying to make. Woes of having a bad typing structure.
Just to reiterate the point was, you need to apply the force or resist it before you can go back into the talking stage if you deem that as your follow up action. If you are on the receiving end its more vital to stop the attempt to put you in said position of vulnerability. I also dont disagree the validity of the verbal component but when actually fighting, you need to actually apply the physical or fight it off to re enforce the verbal when it comes to it. Thats the point i tried to make at the * before i broke the structure to fit it in. The usage of words can help you sometimes, not all the time though, it can also get third parties in on your side if its a extended fight.
I also had no real comment on how to actually grapple, my usage of words was for literary effect. i would personally just punch what ever i can punch to try and break out of it as that's the only method i can do.
Just reading through the following responses, I think that there is a disconnect on what "force" is in some ways.
If you have had training in Law Enforcement/Corrections, your department or agency will have a "use of force continuum" in some way that defines the different levels of resistance and different levels of responses to control that resistance. The terms vary, but most are very similar conceptually. In all of the ones I have seen (haven't seen them all so if someone has experience with one that differs greatly, I would love to learn about it). Pain compliance and joint locks are used for the lower levels of force. They are NOT used when someone is actively trying to punch and kick you. BUT, verbal directions are always a part of everything we do in all levels of force.
To achieve pain compliance....you must give them verbal instructions to comply to....without that....you just have pain.
To achieve pain compliance....you must give them verbal instructions to comply to....without that....you just have pain.
Not always.
I might be trying to elicit a response. Say nose pressure would be a simple one I use for either bite defense or to get a choke sunk in.