Flying Crane
Sr. Grandmaster
I think that there are some real problems if the school is a for-profit endeavor, and students are required to teach for free. But I think a lot of it depends.
People have cited over and over the benefit in your own learning, thru teaching. Agreed. And it could be viewed as part of the apprenticeship is learning to teach, and in doing so you need to practice teaching.
I think there is a right way and a wrong way to go about it. In one of the schools where I train, this is how it works. The head teacher is always present, and is in charge of class. We usually have a group training session, and later break off by level. Often, he will assign a higher belt to teach something to a lower belt, but he is always there overseeing the process. These teaching sessions might last for half an hour or so, he doesn't just turn the class over to the student and then head out to the bar or something.
Likewise, if he needs to be absent from class, he will ask one of the senior students to take control of the class and give a good session. This doesn't happen often.
In this way, the students are getting the experience from teaching, but it's not a burdensome responsibility. In addition, the tuition we pay is very very low compared to most schools in our area.
On the other end of the extreme would be if the head teacher assigned certain classes to the senior students, and told him, "you are now responsible for wednesday and friday night classes, you need to be there and teach every wednesday and friday night. Don't miss it". And then he continues to charge tuition to the senior student as well, while collecting the profit from the school and not bothering to even show up on wednesday and friday nights himself. I think this is a problem. It's even worse if the head teacher also begins to neglect the training of the senior students who are doing much of the teaching. There is a difference between teaching someone how to teach, and treating someone like an employee but without pay.
People have cited over and over the benefit in your own learning, thru teaching. Agreed. And it could be viewed as part of the apprenticeship is learning to teach, and in doing so you need to practice teaching.
I think there is a right way and a wrong way to go about it. In one of the schools where I train, this is how it works. The head teacher is always present, and is in charge of class. We usually have a group training session, and later break off by level. Often, he will assign a higher belt to teach something to a lower belt, but he is always there overseeing the process. These teaching sessions might last for half an hour or so, he doesn't just turn the class over to the student and then head out to the bar or something.
Likewise, if he needs to be absent from class, he will ask one of the senior students to take control of the class and give a good session. This doesn't happen often.
In this way, the students are getting the experience from teaching, but it's not a burdensome responsibility. In addition, the tuition we pay is very very low compared to most schools in our area.
On the other end of the extreme would be if the head teacher assigned certain classes to the senior students, and told him, "you are now responsible for wednesday and friday night classes, you need to be there and teach every wednesday and friday night. Don't miss it". And then he continues to charge tuition to the senior student as well, while collecting the profit from the school and not bothering to even show up on wednesday and friday nights himself. I think this is a problem. It's even worse if the head teacher also begins to neglect the training of the senior students who are doing much of the teaching. There is a difference between teaching someone how to teach, and treating someone like an employee but without pay.