And there were various "Merikan" and other fighting exhibitions in Japan and China in this period and even in the 20s.
Again, where was Ueshiba?
Minding his own business.
Morihei Ueshiba - Wikipedia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And there were various "Merikan" and other fighting exhibitions in Japan and China in this period and even in the 20s.
Again, where was Ueshiba?
are we even aware of any person ever saying "hey, I beat Ueshiba"?
Nope there seems to be a lack of that kind of thing ....and I would think that there just might be lol ............I agree with you and it is well well documented about who he beat and who challenged him and as you say none seem to have got the better of him and most after he dumped him on their rears etc seemed to want him to teach them lol.................but Hanzou doesn't like that sort of thing as he only accepts vids and the rest to back things up or articles he wants to read
Until 1922. Again, plenty of public exhibition matches happening in this time frame.
You mean I don't like stories and beliefs backed by nothing more than anecdotal evidence?
Absolutely.
I'm talking about this portion:
Yeah, it's clear that he looks down on such styles.
Well when there's no one there to corroborate the stories besides Ueshiba himself or someone who eventually became his disciple, how can we ever determine if he ever lost? We also can't determine if he actually ever won. The evidence surrounding him and the art that he created really doesn't support any of the claims.
It’s an odd thing, because Pranin didn’t consistently show that blindness to those factors. I wish I’d had a chance to have a more in-depth discussion with him.BTW, this article intrigued me:
Are you an unwitting participant in the demise of Aikido? by Stanley Pranin – Aikido Journal
Basically it discusses that Aikido is declining globally, and it lists a variety of reasons why. In the process, it disparages popular fighting arts as "flashy" and laughingly paints exponents of those arts as simplistic brutes who just want to destroy people. All the while, the author gushes over O' Sensei as if he was some sort of almighty deity and is seemingly confused as to why his disciples are somehow unable to transfer his "magic" to other people. There are even commentators in that article saying that O'Sensei was the pinnacle of the art and no one can match it.
I find this sort of thing disturbing on multiple levels. IMO, the reasons for Aikido's decline is very obvious and quite clear. People want results, not promises. You can say all the crap you want about O'Sensei's feats of magic, but if Aikido isn't teaching you how to stop a takedown or a punch in the face, none of that matters.
Amazingly people like the author are purposely avoiding those reasons because he has a cult mentality.
Dead or not, Pranin does seem to have had a blind spot in this area.You are aware that The author is now dead ?
I love how you slag of an art but when you are called on something you refuse to answer lol ....but hey ho you keep it up
Looks down on such people. In none of those portions he's talking about martial arts styles.
Morihei Ueshiba was the most famous martial artist in Japan in this period. Numerous martial arts experts flocked to hi, became his students and never went back to their previous styles again. If you dismiss every single testimony of any person that actually saw or met him (and all those testimonies by A LOT of martial arts EXPERTS say that he was the real deal), how do you explain this?
Dead or not, Pranin does seem to have had a blind spot in this area.
Looks down on such people. In none of those portions he's talking about martial arts styles.
Morihei Ueshiba was the most famous martial artist in Japan in this period. Numerous martial arts experts flocked to hi, became his students and never went back to their previous styles again. If you dismiss every single testimony of any person that actually saw or met him (and all those testimonies by A LOT of martial arts EXPERTS say that he was the real deal), how do you explain this?
No you are and have zero respect or understanding and it so apparent in what you say and as I said I'd love to see you on a mat with an Aikidoka of the hard styles or Daito-ryu lol
What would I have to gain from that pointless exercise?
Understanding possibly and if you tape it then you can show that what you say is all true
He looks down on young people seeking martial knowledge? He calls them arrogant and lacking a moral compass? That's just as bad, if not worse.
Unfortunately we have no choice but to. You're dealing with highly biased sources who have a personal stake in making their old master look good.
They are not biased sources at all ....it you that is biased and seem to lack the understanding and also you only cherry pick what you want to see
He looks down on young people seeking martial knowledge? He calls them arrogant and lacking a moral compass? That's just as bad, if not worse.
Unfortunately we have no choice but to. You're dealing with highly biased sources who have a personal stake in making their old master look good.
or accounts by people from other arts who did not become his students but said he was the greatest, from the top of my head J. Kano, Yasuhiro Konishi, Hideo Sonobe, Haga Junichi.
A biased source is someone who is prejudicial. You don't get more prejudicial than a devoted disciple of a leader.
You don't need a tape of me taking down an Aikidoka using wrestling/grappling to show what I say is true. Taped evidence already exists.