Conceptually (which is how I tend to look at things) you would still be. When I train a technique, I tend to train that way - recoveries, counters, etc. all become part of training that technique. Of course, it doesn't make for a nice boundary to stay within, because you can keep pushing that hazy grey area back a bit until pretty soon you've managed to fit everything in by somehow relating it to that technique.Well yes, but even then you'd have to neglect the rest of your game.
Let's take your hip throw example; there's a lot of ways to get there. Maybe you off balance him with some sort of strike and step in, or maybe you fake a double and go high, maybe you get it from an over under clinch, maybe you catch him on an over extension or he tried some spinning **** from too close. Etcetera etcetera...
Sure, you can train for all these variables and more, but are you really training around one technique at that point?