Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So...uh...the "Stay to Play" is missing from the USAT website. Now what?
So...uh...the "Stay to Play" is missing from the USAT website. Now what?
Um....don't want to aggravaate anyone, but if you haven't asked about an exemption yet, how do you know they won't just say, "Okay. No problem."?
Um....don't want to aggravaate anyone, but if you haven't asked about an exemption yet, how do you know they won't just say, "Okay. No problem."?
Um....don't want to aggravaate anyone, but if you haven't asked about an exemption yet, how do you know they won't just say, "Okay. No problem."?
Um....don't want to aggravaate anyone, but if you haven't asked about an exemption yet, how do you know they won't just say, "Okay. No problem."?
Um....don't want to aggravaate anyone, but if you haven't asked about an exemption yet, how do you know they won't just say, "Okay. No problem."?
Actually I wonder how they are going to police it. I would love to be as trusting as you, but I know these people - well. IMHO Some will get exemptions, some won't. Depends on who you are and who you know. Stupid thing is a great number of people stay at these hotels already because they are close or they think they are cheap. The problem is being forced to do it.
It is not just about getting the free comp rooms, USAT gets a kickback on all the hotel rooms booked through THS.
As with many people, I think that people are more upset about having their right to choose revoked.
I would not use the term kickback. to me kickback implies getting money back from a vendor and the only one who knows about it is the person getting the money. In this case it is pretty clear the USAT will be getting something for using THS.
If people feel this strongly about it they should not go. Just go to the AAU event held the same time. Then let the USAT know the reason you will not be comming and stick to it.
The last thing I will say on this subject here is the member are suppose to have a voice which we do not anymore, secondly the USAT are doing everything possible to ruin what could be one of the strongest orgs. for competition, without the membership and all the little people they do not have enough money to run the NGB for the sport but maybe that by itself is a great thing.
I would not use the term kickback. to me kickback implies getting money back from a vendor and the only one who knows about it is the person getting the money. In this case it is pretty clear the USAT will be getting something for using THS.
If people feel this strongly about it they should not go. Just go to the AAU event held the same time. Then let the USAT know the reason you will not be comming and stick to it.
Well once again USAT does not know what is going on, just got off the phne with a Austin he is an intern and knows nothing about anything, then this lady comes on and tell me that the only person with any authority about this is Mark kaufman and he is not available. When ask if I could talk to the head honcho I was no and that Mark would return my phone call when he has time. Well ain't that to know when he has time, forget about when I have time or if I will have time it is solely up to them about when they get back to you. My God I feel like I am a kid again waiting for daddys approval.
Forgive - rebate is the correct term, kickback is what I feel today. When does the bleeding end? The grassroots have never been a priority with the USAT. At first it was, "we have to do this first, then we will get there." now it is "We have to take care of the Elite players first - membership still increases." Well it doesn't work that way. We now have 4 athletes who are getting stipends. Last year we had 4 athletes - and two of them failed to make the team. We started a U24 team as part of a sort of grassroots effort and IMHO screwed them over. This year the Elite Division was eliminated except for 14-32 black belts..... and on and on. We have a board member who "Firmly believes that the governance of this organization belongs to the Males. This is a male dominated sport and the men should handle the governance." We can't have a female Olympic Coach because there "isn't one who put someone on the team" and then we send a male buddy of certain people who never put anyone on the team and overlook a female who did.
I don't think you have to worry about this being the smallest JO's in history, I think that has already been insured.