OP
TonyM.
Guest
- Thread Starter
- #101
For me, PSI radar has caught the correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About "Free Speech"
Freedom of Speech is a worthy concept and one which I support wholeheartedly. Indeed it is one of the founding principles of this forum. However, it is important to understand the limitations of this principle and not to abuse it.
You must understand that, especially in regard to website discussion forums, the argument "What about my right to free speech?" simply doesn't hold water either legally or morally.
General Legal Stuff
Free speech does not give you the right to publicly say whatever you like -- it actually has many limitations. There are more laws governing what you can't say than what you can.
You have the right to certain religious, political and other beliefs, and you have the right to express your opinions in an appropriate way without fear of oppression. This does not mean you can demean, insult, slander or offend other people. You cannot give away personal information without consent. You cannot publish adult-only material in a public manner. You cannot publish racist or hateful material. You cannot force your opinion on other people against their will. There are many, many things you can't do.
In addition, although you may have the legal right to express a certain opinion in a public place, this does not mean you have any legal right at all to express this same opinion on someone else's property or in someone else's publication.
Your Free Speech Rights at This Forum
To put it bluntly, the only rights you have here are the rights we decide to issue. This is our website and we run it in the way we believe is most appropriate to facilitate our goals.
If you invite me into your house or place of business, I will respect your values and your code of conduct. If you don't like swearing, I won't swear. If you prefer that I don't discuss religion or politics, I won't. If I don't like your house rules, then maybe I won't bother coming back to your house.
This site is our home and you are our valued guest. We want you to enjoy your time here -- all we ask is that you respect our house rules. If you find that the rules are not to your liking, you don't have to visit. You are free to set up your own website and implement your own set of rules.
There is usually a way to express your opinion without breaking the rules or offending anyone. Sometimes you just have to work a bit harder to make it happen!
Hi All,TonyM. said:For me, PSI radar has caught the correct.
GAB said:Hi KT,
I guess I am just a conspiracy kind of guy...LOL
Are you telling me NOT...I am not talking about this particular group only..Just look at all the different names and the different posts and the ones I am
talking about that are not Card Carrying Supporting members and all that stuff...4% on MT are supporting members...
I know You probably don't think sears and ammco and goodyear never cheated anyone either, I guess my mind has been in to many locations, along with my body, been into way to many fights... (streets..for you Robert)...
Just write me off as Brain Degradation, like Dr. Dave has...
Not the fact that I have been in to much stuff to not be a continuous skeptic...And such a nice boy when I was young....
To many none profile and all that good stuff... Come on please KT as sharp as you are, are you really that naive....
Regards, Gary
<snip>QUOTE]
Now Gary. You are speaking to the Queen of Paranoia (David Crosby notwithstanding...) Yes, I've been accused of rampant naivete on numerous occasions -- but *one* has to believe in something, doesn't *one*?
And, by-the-by, I am *one* of *them* - a Supporting Member. I just didn't want my name "up in lights", and requested that I be as anonymous as possible in that regard. Sooo. Where does that place me within the pantheon of Supporting Members?
The boys do love a good debate, as I stated earlier. Yes, they tend to lean a bit to the left at times, but tell me something: can you deny that you've learned a thing or two from them (and been entertained in the process) on occasion? I dislike when the name-calling starts and have attempted to de-fuse the situation once or twice, although not a moderator myself, because free speech is what it's all about around here. 'Sides, I kinda like them.:idunno:
As to Churchill and his remarks, it is my conclusion from reading all that's been posted that he is really a demagogue preaching treacherous ideas and ideals under the guise of academic freedom. That does not, of course, apply to the vast majority of academics in this country, but it's what makes us interesting as a nation. At the risk of being viewed as naive once again, I've got to believe that Churchill will have his comeuppance eventually -- hopefully sooner rather than later.
Hey Gar. I just heard there's no such thing as Santa Claus!:wink2: kt
GAB said:Hi All,
I truly believe all of the persons had some good stuff... Got a bit heated but it was not over done by any means in my Humble Opinion...
If you take the post by HHJH. It is very apparent why Joe got his, if in fact HHJH know's what he is talking about, and not just perpetuating his take, or the secret of his fellow poster...
I believe there are numerous posters that are the same person different location like the library or the school or their job or whatever...
They are only fooling themselves, not others but hey, no biggie...I don't do it and that is all that matters to me...
I have a feeling this is pretty much over so I will probably be blamed for its demise... BOO HOO...
Regards, Gary
Hi, More power to you, and others.. I have no conspiracy theory. Words placed in topic...I just went a long with it...Lots of head games on the web. those that do need to get a life.psi_radar said:Hi Gary,
I'm not part of any conspiracy. However troubling you may find it, there are others out there who have come to the same conclusions purely as a mechanism of their own free thought.
I'm pretty sure I'd seen it before somewhere, but am disinclined to afford this claim any credibility if you don't cite a reference. :rofl:That fact that I'm a "he" has come up before
Hi Peach,PeachMonkey said:I've been curious about Gary's conspiracy theories of "multiple posters", but have avoided commenting until now; however, he seems unwilling to let it die.
I'm not sure why the fact that I wasn't discussing my gender in this thread must somehow mean that HHJH and I (or is it Robert and I? or all three of us?) are the same person. I didn't correct Joe's suggestions because my gender is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand (as were many of his wandering, insulting diatribes related to my gender, among other things).
That fact that I'm a "he" has come up before; both Steve and Fiesty Mouse know me in person. I'm a student at Steve's school. Steve wasn't "outing" me to point this out.
This also isn't the first time that someone I've spoken with has decided to assume from the name "PeachMonkey" that I must be female, and throw some kind of gender-based insult. None of them have been worth responding to.
Come on KT Guys??? Some persons!!!kenpo tiger said:The scariest part of who you are, Peach, is that your intelligence and knowledge are light years ahead of most who are your seniors.
Funny how guys go for gender bashing terms the moment they feel threatened.
Silly Flatlander, always insisting on evidenceFlatlander said:I'm pretty sure I'd seen it before somewhere, but am disinclined to afford this claim any credibility if you don't cite a reference. :rofl: