I do wonder if they sent the police officer to my house simply to intimidate me. They could’ve posted the letter, after all.
If this appeal doesn’t work I think I can take it to civil court which I’ve now decided I will do despite the threat of £2,500 legal fees should I lose, because I feel the behaviour of BF is unjust. Using the ‘C.R.A.C’ method of argument I can’t see how three magistrates won’t allow me to have the sword:
1) Conclusion- The sword should not have been seized by BF and should be released to as soon as possible because it fulfils three of their four criteria for import.
2) Rule -BF’s
own exceptions from prohibition to import a curved blade greater than 55cm long are
- was made before 1954
- was made by traditional methods of making swords by hand
- is only available for the purposes of use in religious ceremonies or for martial arts
- is for use in a historical re-enactments or sporting activity for example a martial arts demonstration for which public liability insurance is held
3) Analysis - This sword was hand made and by traditional methods as evidenced by…the sword dealer from whom I bought it, a statement from the son/apprentice of the (deceased) swordsmith who made the sword (with photos), a letter from a respected British antique sword dealer who gives the pedigree of the swordsmith who only made traditional swords by hand. I will use this sword for training in martial arts and I have supplied evidence of my membership of the BKA complete with evidence of third party liability insurance.
4) This sword should not have been seized by BF since it clearly fulfils three of the criteria it sets out as an exception from prohibition to import into the U.K. and it should be returned to me immediately.
Doesn’t that all sound reasonable and watertight?