This from Deaf:
This from Duncan Mitchell, from Japan, from Nagato's dojo:
(Bold and Italics are my emphasis, not in original)
How was what I posted false in light of this? Now, mind you, this is not the only thing I'm going off of, but this is the most public statement I've read.
And we can continue this in pm if you like, but don't leave such a contentious statement hanging and then bow out of discussion--especially when I linked backing public material close to the source of the discussion in my 'false' post...
Cheers,
Well that is totally false. Think what you will however do be prepared to the fact that if you are training with SKH, you WILL be turned down by the Bujinkan. This information has been passed down by the Bujinkan Admins during their seminars etc.
This from Duncan Mitchell, from Japan, from Nagato's dojo:
I talked to Nagato-sensei just maybe a session or two after any anouncement was made. I found out about it because he had just told someone that if he trained with Ishizuka-sensei that he was not to train at Nagato's dojo. I then quizzed Nagato-sensei with a few questions and the basic message I got was
- Soke had said we shouldn't train with Ishizuka or Muramatsu (Hayes wasn't mentioned - but that doesn't supprise me as I am Australian)
- That it wasn't a "Bujinkan" rule and that Hatsumi-sensei hadn't made an announcement but may make one very soon - but might not.
- That the rule was for Nagato's classes.
- Finally that soke was a "nice guy" so he might not make it an issue so it was up to Nagato-sensei himself.
Maybe this is a bit different than what was heard the first time this was announced by Nagato-sensei but I am certain that this is what was said. Maybe it had been softened over a week or two?
----------------
Duncan Mitchell
(Bold and Italics are my emphasis, not in original)
How was what I posted false in light of this? Now, mind you, this is not the only thing I'm going off of, but this is the most public statement I've read.
And we can continue this in pm if you like, but don't leave such a contentious statement hanging and then bow out of discussion--especially when I linked backing public material close to the source of the discussion in my 'false' post...
Cheers,