Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess I wasn’t clear. I don’t was referring to the roots, not recent usage. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t a military group using boxing now. Arguably, the WWI usage qualifies, but boxing has much older roots than that. I think I heard recently that it started as self-defense training. I am no boxing historian so I don’t know how accurate that is.Seal team 6 uses boxing coaches.
Who Teaches SEAL Team 6 How to Fight? | TIME.com
Boxing used in world war 1.
What don't youlike about Krav Maga?Everybody's someone elses ninja.
You say XMA. I say Krav Maga.
I guess I wasn’t clear. I don’t was referring to the roots, not recent usage. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t a military group using boxing now. Arguably, the WWI usage qualifies, but boxing has much older roots than that. I think I heard recently that it started as self-defense training. I am no boxing historian so I don’t know how accurate that is.
What don't youlike about Krav Maga?
When you say compliant, do you really mean that they demo material that only works on the unskilled? Or do you think krav is routinely trained in a manner where techniques are applied because the teacher directs students not to resist?When it trains contrived rubbish against compliant partners.
Internet instructorships dont help either.
When you say compliant, do you really mean that they demo material that only works on the unskilled? Or do you think krav is routinely trained in a manner where techniques are applied because the teacher directs students not to resist?
None that I have seen.Krav is trained in that manner.
None that I have seen.
But then I heard that it's popularity sparked a lot of rapid growth with mixed quality teaching.
Why do you think it is that students would avoid applying resistance to their training of their own accord?I am sure the krav you have seen is different.
Most students simply follow the training methods provided in a program.Why do you think it is that students would avoid applying resistance to their training of their own accord?
Why do you think it is that students would avoid applying resistance to their training of their own accord?
I think there's also a side-effect of some drills. The wrist releases, for instance - when they are taught to a new student, their wrists typically are easily chafed. We want them to get in enough repetitions in that one class, so the partner may start to lighten their grip in an effort to save the wrists (especially if their own wrists are starting to get sore). In some drills, the harder you resist, the harder it is for your partner to be gentle (say, a hip throw drill or a single-leg drill), so you provide light resistance or none at all, so you get a softer fall after a few repetitions. And when a student (especially a newer one) is learning a new technique, that early learning is done with little or no resistance (whichever is more appropriate to what is being learned).For many, it's an unconscious or unintentional result of wanting their training partner to succeed.
If you're working on a release from a wrist grab, for example, and the "attacker" doesn't hold tightly, the release is much easier. Of course, then you don't know if the release worked because you did it right or because they turned loose.
I think there's also a side-effect of some drills. The wrist releases, for instance - when they are taught to a new student, their wrists typically are easily chafed. We want them to get in enough repetitions in that one class, so the partner may start to lighten their grip in an effort to save the wrists (especially if their own wrists are starting to get sore). In some drills, the harder you resist, the harder it is for your partner to be gentle (say, a hip throw drill or a single-leg drill), so you provide light resistance or none at all, so you get a softer fall after a few repetitions. And when a student (especially a newer one) is learning a new technique, that early learning is done with little or no resistance (whichever is more appropriate to what is being learned).
Over time, these become habit. In and of themselves, these examples aren't awful, so long as there's sufficient resisted training, too. But often those habits lessen the resistance given during the resisted training exercises, too.
I think there's also a side-effect of some drills. The wrist releases, for instance - when they are taught to a new student, their wrists typically are easily chafed. We want them to get in enough repetitions in that one class, so the partner may start to lighten their grip in an effort to save the wrists (especially if their own wrists are starting to get sore). In some drills, the harder you resist, the harder it is for your partner to be gentle (say, a hip throw drill or a single-leg drill), so you provide light resistance or none at all, so you get a softer fall after a few repetitions. And when a student (especially a newer one) is learning a new technique, that early learning is done with little or no resistance (whichever is more appropriate to what is being learned).
Over time, these become habit. In and of themselves, these examples aren't awful, so long as there's sufficient resisted training, too. But often those habits lessen the resistance given during the resisted training exercises, too.
Something I try to communicate to students is that some attacks you don't reasonably escape while they are happening (like a rear naked choke that is fully sunk in). You have to defend before they start or frustrate what they hoped to do. A RNC, you have to disrupt it before it gets sunk in, unless you are really good. With a rear bearhug like they were showing, you either disrupt the grip before it clamps down (same principle as the RNC), or you frustrate their attempt to lift (one of the more likely next steps, and probably the most dangerous) or whatever they are trying to do once they grab and look for an opening to change the math. Moving your butt to the side won't work if they are attached, because they'll have your weight. It might if you do it before they close the grip.Defence against back grabs are generally pretty telling. Because if they are really latched on you are going to have a hell of a time getting them off and the defences seem futile. So they start to do work arounds.
Here is some compliant drilling.
Why do you think it is that students would avoid applying resistance to their training of their own accord?
Something I try to communicate to students is that some attacks you don't reasonably escape while they are happening (like a rear naked choke that is fully sunk in). You have to defend before they start or frustrate what they hoped to do. A RNC, you have to disrupt it before it gets sunk in, unless you are really good. With a rear bearhug like they were showing, you either disrupt the grip before it clamps down (same principle as the RNC), or you frustrate their attempt to lift (one of the more likely next steps, and probably the most dangerous) or whatever they are trying to do once they grab and look for an opening to change the math. Moving your butt to the side won't work if they are attached, because they'll have your weight. It might if you do it before they close the grip.
Defence against back grabs are generally pretty telling. Because if they are really latched on you are going to have a hell of a time getting them off and the defences seem futile. So they start to do work arounds.
Here is some compliant drilling.
I don't have any personal experience with Krav Maga, but I've encountered schools for other arts where training never progresses past beginner level compliance and resistance.It seriously beggars belief that anyone who trains regularly would sit with beginner level compliance and resistance.