The Thing (not a remake)

MA-Caver

Sr. Grandmaster
MT Mentor
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
14,960
Reaction score
312
Location
Chattanooga, TN
One of the trailer titles I saw made me roll my eyes and groan aloud. The Thing. Oh geez why would they want to remake this great, fun, scary flick from master horror director John Carpenter. Watching the trailer didn't help... but this article in Wiki did and made me feel a lot better about the upcoming film.

A snippet
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(2011_film)
After creating the Dawn of the Dead remake, producers Marc Abraham and Eric Newman began to look through the Universal Studios library to find new properties to work on. Upon finding John Carpenter's 1982 film The Thing, the two convinced Universal to create a prequel instead of a remake, as they found remaking Carpenter's film would be like "paint(ing) a mustache on the Mona Lisa"[SUP][16][/SUP] Eric Newman explained; "I'd be the first to say no one should ever try to do Jaws again and I certainly wouldn't want to see anyone remake The Exorcist... And we really felt the same way about The Thing. It's a great film. But once we realized there was a new story to tell, with the same characters and the same world, but from a very different point of view, we took it as a challenge. It's the story about the guys who are just ghosts in Carpenter's movie - they're already dead. But having Universal give us a chance to tell their story was irresistible."[SUP][17][/SUP]

So it's what happened to the Norwegians prior to their arrival at the American's camp. One wonders how they'll tie the two ends together, the ending and the beginning of the original (?) film. If recalled, the last survivors of the Norwegians were chasing a sled dog and one of them was shot and the other blown up with the heli. The dog of course was the creature in full disguise until it's shocking reveal.

For me this is an okay thing to do with an already established film. Tell the backstory/prequel in a manner that answers questions anyone may have from the (Carpenter's) version. Now supposedly if this film turns out to be a hit, someone will tell the story of Macready and Childs and whether or not they survived the night and/or was rescued and The Thing reaches the mainland, which would of course, open a whole new can of worms right there.

Here is the trailer by the way:
[yt]XCHuSKnFYzY[/yt]
 
Irony, thy name is "Caver.":lfao:

"The Thing" by ohn Caprnter was itself a remake of a 50' sci-fi classic with James Arness of "Gunsmoke" fame....the remake was somewhat more faithful to the novel, Who Goes There?......
Oh I know that "The Thing From Another World" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0044121/ 1951 and it was a big hit and popular with today's sci-fi fans. And yeah I read Who Goes There by John Campbell http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Goes_There? The two films tell two sides of the same story. Now this third film rendering of that novel will tell yet another side.
It may help round out the the series.
 
Back
Top