dvcochran
Grandmaster
I always use an old pad since it has the shape of the caliper.I use a C-Clamp on the Vette, which has 4-piston calipers. Just lay a strip of metal across the pistons and compress them all at the same time.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I always use an old pad since it has the shape of the caliper.I use a C-Clamp on the Vette, which has 4-piston calipers. Just lay a strip of metal across the pistons and compress them all at the same time.
If you insist.No that is another false accusation.
It doesn't support a narrative. But defines his original question.
Which was basically trained karate guy vs untrained street fighter.
You’re obviously trying to make a point. Why not just make it? I foresee a false equivalency, but I hope to be wrong on that.Would you care if I started giving out cancer cures for money?
I get the sense he means “traditionally trained”. Which - in my opinion- is a somewhat meaningless distinction.I think he means 'formally' trained (regardless of style(s)) but for some reason has not presented the question that way. Just keep running in circles.
false positives are allowed for in the scientific methodIt is not that they didn't get things right it is that they also got things wrong and basically struggled to tell the difference.
Dowsing is still being promoted as viable through the same method people used to detect poisonous mushrooms.
I mean imagine you tried that but had someone who was allergic?
It would throw your method out.
False positives are a reality in measurement. It is the result of an equation. Sometimes the input data is flawed/contaminated and effects the results.false positives are allowed for in the scientific method
allowed and INTENTIONALLY introduced are clearly different concepts, they are '' FIGURED'' out by repeatabilityFalse positives are a reality in measurement. It is the result of an equation. Sometimes the input data is flawed/contaminated and effects the results.
When you say they are 'allowed' it sounds like they are intentionally induced. Not so. They just happen as part of the measurement and/or error in measurement.
Figuring out that they are indeed false can be a challenge sometimes.
Agree. In the context that we understand it today, SM has not been around all that long. Much of 'civilization' was just figuring out how to survive. So few variables were known, it is understandable how much of history got off on tangents based on a few peoples very strong, but very wrong belief's. The Salem witch trials or Flat earth (which is still a belief by some???)are good examples.allowed and INTENTIONALLY introduced are clearly different concepts, they are '' FIGURED'' out by repeatability
my point is the '' scientific method'' has been around since the beginning of human civilisation` otherwise we would still be living in caves and eating poisonous mushrooms
no the scientific method is exactly the same now as its always been, it just took a lot longer to gather the data and usually resulted in a lot more death and injury, unless its the pharmaceutical industry we are talking about, they still seem to wait 20 years and count the dead to decide if something was a good idea or notAgree. In the context that we understand it today, SM has not been around all that long. Much of 'civilization' was just figuring out how to survive. So few variables were known, it is understandable how much of history got off on tangents based on a few peoples very strong, but very wrong belief's. The Salem witch trials or Flat earth (which is still a belief by some???)are good examples.
Very often profit drives human expansion/contraction regardless of the SM evidence. The false positive is used as a product in and of itself. That can make some weird stuff happen.
I think he meant "accounted for". Which a good scientific approach attempts to do, at least.False positives are a reality in measurement. It is the result of an equation. Sometimes the input data is flawed/contaminated and effects the results.
When you say they are 'allowed' it sounds like they are intentionally induced. Not so. They just happen as part of the measurement and/or error in measurement.
Figuring out that they are indeed false can be a challenge sometimes.
your dismissal of dowsing is the very opposite of the scientific method, you could say dowsing has never been shown to work under controlled conditions, but you would be wrong, it has, if a very small number of people getting a greater return than allowed by chance is a positive resultIt is not that they didn't get things right it is that they also got things wrong and basically struggled to tell the difference.
Dowsing is still being promoted as viable through the same method people used to detect poisonous mushrooms.
I mean imagine you tried that but had someone who was allergic?
It would throw your method out.
no i meant ALLOWED, if you dont allow false positives ( ie things that disagree with your hypothesis) into your data set set, then there's significant conformational bias in your studyI think he meant "accounted for". Which a good scientific approach attempts to do, at least.
no the scientific method is exactly the same now as its always been, it just took a lot longer to gather the data and usually resulted in a lot more death and injury, unless its the pharmaceutical industry we are talking about, they still seem to wait 20 years and count the dead to decide if something was a good idea or not
That there's people who have deep superstition in positions of power is still a significant barrier to the progress of man kind as its always been. i remember a deep shiver of terror going down my spine when i found out that the man with his finger on the nuclear button (GWB) was known to pray for gods guidance on matters of international affairs (like who to nuke) his partner in '' crime'' our very own tony blair admitted that he invaded iraq as its was gods work he was doing
im rightly suspicious of people who have imaginary friends, its cute but a bit sad with loney children, its down right a worry if they have life and death power over you,Using your analogy, how long do you think the pharmaceutical industry, or even witch doctors have been around? Mankind goes back much further, well before any semblance of SM.
That you feel praying is illogical is not at all surprising. I want the leaders of our country's making life decisions for millions of people without any and all types of counsel; yea that is what I want.
Go ahead and give me your jaded response that we all know is coming.
rudimentary medical treatment goes back to the beginning of mankind, if you want to call them witch doctors ok,Using your analogy, how long do you think the pharmaceutical industry, or even witch doctors have been around? Mankind goes back much further, well before any semblance of SM.
That you feel praying is illogical is not at all surprising. I want the leaders of our country's making life decisions for millions of people without any and all types of counsel; yea that is what I want.
Go ahead and give me your jaded response that we all know is coming.
Wildly different from SM.rudimentary medical treatment goes back to the beginning of mankind, if you want to call them witch doctors ok,
Most technological nation on earth. Coincidence?im rightly suspicious of people who have imaginary friends, its cute but a bit sad with loney children, its down right a worry if they have life and death power over you,
its not even that they believe in a higher power that's the main worry, its that they think the higher power talks to them. surely he or she would be to busy running the cosmos to worry where you've left your car keys or if you should nuke north korea
there's some frighteningly high % of the american public who believe the book genesis is literal, finding that level of ignorant supersticion in goat herders in afghanistan is one thing, in the most technological nation on earth it takes some getting your head round
im beginning to think we can add '' the scientific method'' to the list of things you don't understand !Wildly different from SM.
I never said anything of the sort. I merely said it is not nearly as old as you incorrectly imply. Answer a question with an answer; what it Your definition of SM? (it seems your mind is indecently going somewhere else)im beginning to think we can add '' the scientific method'' to the list of things you don't understand !
why don't you tell me what you think it is therefore and why rudentary medical advances in the pliocene, does not count as the SM
what, you think gods give you the gift of technoligy cause you pray a lot ?Most technological nation on earth. Coincidence?