I didn't say I have the perfect fighting style, I said if there is one I would like to know what it is.
Yes, you have never claimed to have a "perfect" style, however, you have claimed to have a system designed with the handicapped/disabled in mind, and have yet to show anything that is actually geared towards their needs. That might be the issue you are coming across here. And as has been said (many, many, many times here and elsewhere, by myself and many others...), there is no such thing as a "perfect" system, if there was, we would all be learning it!
It also seems to me that everyone is talking about fighting systems that take a life time to learn. Some people don't have a life time.
No, what we are talking about is the fact that it takes a long time to master such an area of knowledge. I can realistically get someone completely street-effective in about 3 months, but it is going to be some of the most painful, scary, uncomfortable 3 months that person will ever go through! But I cannot get them to master a complete art in such time, that will take years at the least. But without that understanding, creating a new art will not really be possible, as you will simply not have the knowledge or understanding of the underlying principles that will be needed to create such an art.
They can be taught simple things like eye gouges. Knowing anything is better then knowing nothing.
Although an eye gouge can be physically simple, it is quite another thing to overcome the social considerations and generate the mindset required to actually use such a technique. Even in high stress environments, people can get quite squeamish. But if that is what you are looking for, and you want advise on other systems to look to, check out Richard Dmitri's Senshido, in particular their "Shredder" concept, used as a go-to concept for any close-quarters defence. Again, there's no need to go around re-inventing the wheel just because you lack the experience to know where it already is (and for the record, Richard's Shredder is little more than an application of Ninjutsu's Shako Ken, or similar from many other Japanese and Chinese arts, as well as I'm sure many many others).
With regard to your last statement there, there is a phrase which can be very well applied to martial arts study, and that is "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing". In essence, having a little experience, and believing you actually know what you are doing is not good. You can do more harm than good here, by trying half-tested ideas, having a false sense of their applicability (due to a lack of understanding of the variations in different environments, which just comes from a lack of experience), and much more. And in regards to a student having a little knowledge, if they put all their faith in one technique (an eye gouge), as that is all they know, and cannot apply it, or it doesn't work, that can actually lead to more panic than if they didn't have it at all, which can put them in even more danger.
I also stated that the techniques in the video are basics. If it was something hard to do how would it benefeit anyone. They are simple and to the point. They can even be countered easily.
Basics are good (although it could be argued what alternative would you have, given your limited experience), simple and to the point is good as well. No-one is arguing those points. The argument is how are these geared towards the handicapped, as that has been your claim.
The whole point is I want to show people something that doesn't take forever to set up. My techniques do work.
Your techniques do work... for you. In the way you have them shown here. With a compliant partner. Not sure about the rest. But as for something that "doesn't take forever to set up", I'm not really sure what you are talking about. Many arts are just as direct, and require just as little set up. Within the Ninjutsu schools, many techniques are trained and taught from what we refer to as a Shizen no kamae, or Shizentai. This is a "natural posture, or natural body", and is simply you just standing there, with no pre-set posture or set-up, and many other arts do just the same thing. Again, you are trying to reinvent a wheel due to not knowing that many others have been riding around on theirs for years.
The techniques you have seen are for people who are just weaker as I have said.
You know, I didn't know where I was going to put this part, but here seems as good a place as any. I'm going to go through your clips one by one, and we'll see how they stack up against your claim here.
CLIP 1: SELF DEFENCE (Quote from the opening blurb) "This is my own fighting private style, The Destroyer Style. It is a mixture of all fighting styles I know. I have used only techniques that work. All of my techniques could permanently injure an opponent so please do not practice them unless you do them slow and cautiously. Never fight unless it is a life or death situation. Every life is valuable and should be protected...."
Well, this little blurb is quite an impressive sounding one, until you look closely an see that what you are saying is that you are experienced (not from everything else we've seen), and you are fixated on the violence (come on, you called this system for smaller, weaker people "The DESTROYER Style?"). And there are plenty of reasons to fight without it being life and death, and plenty of assaults that are not life threatening, so your definitions are fairly limited. But I think we know where that comes from.
First Technique. Jab/Knife Counter (From the clip "I would break the arm before getting the choke").
Okay, against a left jab (which is not really going to hit you), you redirect to your left with your left hand, catch the throat/face from over their left shoulder with your right hand, and take the other guy over backwards. If we are to use your description as to who you think this is going to work for, your a bit off. To begin with, your attacker is not punching to target, instead he is hitting short and off to the side (your left), allowing you to get your catch easily. He also drops his guard entirely, and just goes along with your movements after his part is done, so I see little evidence of it working at all here.
But more to the point. If we assume that there is a proper attack, then you need to work on your evasion there, and that may not be possible for a handicapped person (depending on the handicap itself). You have also done absolutely nothing to allow you to get your "choke" there. A simple hit to the ribs (under the attacking arm) would do that, and can flow in quite nicely. But the weirdest thing is if this is designed for a smaller, weaker person, then why are you taking someone forward (with the redirection), then switching them backwards without anything to get them going that way themselves? If the defender really is shorter or weaker, then this technique is flawed, and from a "this really works" standpoint, it needs work, especially if you are going to go against a knife (WAY more control of that hand needed there). But really, if you have broken the arm (against a knife), get out, there is no need to continue! That is ego, son.
Oh, yeah, and that hammerfist is weak and unnecessary. There are far better choices for this defence (still following your flow) for someone smaller or weaker.
Second Technique: Defence against a jab/right cross combination.
Against a left/right combo you have elected to stand your ground (again little evasion), and essentially wear two punches (although it helped that both were off target, and you were guarded). Between the attacks you flick out your right hand towards the attackers left shoulder (pushing him back? Jamming his shoulder? Badly targetted punch?), and kick him back with a right stomping kick. Well, that kick will require a fair amount of strength, so you are again contravening your own ideas here. As well as that, an attacker won't stay far enough back for you to use that kick, so it's a poor choice on a few levels. And you don't get anywhere near enough power into it (see how you are knocked back yourself? That's what I mean). So this one fails for smaller/weaker people, as well as as a practical technique for the street in the set-up you have here.
Third Technique: Jab/Knife Counter.
Well, you catch the attacking arm (still missing any evasion here, but the attacks aren't coming to you either), and push your knee into the back of the opponents knee to drive him down, then pull him back and stomp/kick him in the head. If we take this as a jab defence, then it is overkill, the kick to the head is you going to jail for assault. But before that you need to be able to catch the jab, and that ain't easy. If we take this as a knife assault, you really need to get much better control on the attacking arm, cause you get opened up quite badly in this demo. And again, this technique is not really well suited to weaker or disabled people, as well as being rather flawed on a few levels. The common thread of these techniques is you taking the opponent in different directions by forcing them physically. If you want this to work for smaller/weaker people, that will need to change. Spend some time (a few years at least) training in Aikido to get a better understanding of this.
CLIP 2: Sucker Punch.
Leaving behind the fact that this is not a sucker punch, let's look at it. Against a punch from a distance (which is not going to reach you, by the way), you lean back (the first evasion I've seen here), and bring your hands up to block/deflect the punch, then lean forward and hit to the face (jaw or ears?), and end with the same kick as earlier (left this time). This is actually your best one. Hitting to the ears (if you are) is a better tactic than many others you have stated, and is a good disruptor. But bear in mind the potential damage that can be done. If it's to the jaw, it needs a lot more behind it for you to have any effect, so I'm going to assume you are going for the ears. But realise that without such a compliant partner (who is leaning back before the first hit, and falling before your kick), you will simply not have the distance to perform this, let alone a smaller person having the power to have that kick as a primary tool (although hitting the ears will mean less power will be needed).
CLIP 3: Simple Hip Toss.
Well, what to say here. Frankly, the technique is okay, but not particularly well done. What leaps out at me the most, though, is your lack of concern for the safety of your partner. I do some very hard, nasty things with my training partners, but it is always safe and with concern for their wellbeing. I see none of that here, and that tells me that you have a long way to go in your maturity. But you're young, so you have time. Just stop trying to leap ahead so much, you are just going to stumble and fall.
You all seem to be more worried about laughing me off, instead of trying to point in the right direction to help people. That makes you shallow.
No, Cody, we are not laughing you off, we are pointing out that you do not have the requisite knowledge or experience to do what you are claiming, and in responce we are trying to point you in the right direction. And that direction is to a school with an experienced teacher, so you can realise that what you think you are inventing is a limited version of what is actually out there. Thinking that you know better than those here with less than a year in MMA and less than a year in TKD is far more arrogant.
The color of belts and social standing are useless in a real fight. The one who survies wins the prize of his life. Some of you know this. Some of you will never know. Regardless, I will do all I can to help people. While you look down and tell them what they do wrong. Some of you here care and have given me good advice. Please continue to do so. I will consider all of it as I continue to train and devolpe.
We've covered the belts thing on another thread, but to reiterate, belts are a way of showing experience and understanding. And again, not every fight is life and death. I believe your heart is in the right place, but if you really want to help people in this way, take the time to get the required knowledge and experience before proclaiming yourself the founder of a non-system. Learn from those who have been there, and have done that.
Cody