kenpo tiger
Senior Master
Rest in peace (finally) Terri.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm wondering if you are, in any way, embarrassed by such a callous statement.ghostdog2 said:Terry Schiavo succumbed to dehyration and starvation earlier today. Reportedly, her "husband" had the breakfast buffet at his hotel. The eggs were overcooked, he complained.
Yeah...real classy. Sympathies to her survivors: Parents, husband, other family and friends. Hopefully the healing can start.ghostdog2 said:Terry Schiavo succumbed to dehyration and starvation earlier today. Reportedly, her "husband" had the breakfast buffet at his hotel. The eggs were overcooked, he complained.
I really doubt her husband will mourn at all. He finally got what he wanted, and that is the death of her so called "wife".Feisty Mouse said:.
Now hopefully her loved ones - husband and parents - will be able to mourn, and move on in some way.
Kane said:I really doubt her husband will mourn at all. He finally got what he wanted, and that is the death of her so called "wife".
While I know some of you maybe be happy, know this. No matter how much you think Terry wanted to die, there was no real proof at all that she wanted to die. In that kind of doubt we should have leaned toward life.
What is the worst about this whole case is that she couldn't even get a proper death. We really don't know whether she felt any pain, but let us say she didn't. Is it really justified starving someone to death no matter how much pain is felt? This wouldn't even happen to a dog according to what I have seen.
Kane said:I really doubt her husband will mourn at all. He finally got what he wanted, and that is the death of her so called "wife".
While I know some of you maybe be happy, know this. No matter how much you think Terry wanted to die, there was no real proof at all that she wanted to die. In that kind of doubt we should have leaned toward life.
What is the worst about this whole case is that she couldn't even get a proper death. We really don't know whether she felt any pain, but let us say she didn't. Is it really justified starving someone to death no matter how much pain is felt? This wouldn't even happen to a dog according to what I have seen.
I agree with you. Our sympathy should go out to the husband, Terry and the parents. Pray that we're never in that situation.loki09789 said:Until any of us are there, how can you righteously or rightfully judge. If uncertainty over her condition should side for life in your eyes, how about siding with some sympathetic perspective for the husband's life as well.
I find it distasteful to think about too. I don't know what 'active' measures would be legal in this state or under these circumstances though.Tgace said:Starving her to death was just "wrong" IMO. Her dying was a blessing, but this particular method just leaves a bad taste....
I'm wondering if you are, in any way, embarrassed by such a callous statement
How very presumptuous of you to think that people here don't care, simply because they may disagree with you.ghostdog2 said:Code:I'm wondering if you are, in any way, embarrassed by such a callous statement
Code:
The only embarrassing thing is how shallow and superficial this discussion has become as virtual condolences and bogus sympathies are offered to people none of us have met or know anything about.
Someone posted about the husband now being able to move on. Wise up. He moved on long ago. The family? They got screwed. By virtue of a legal fiction and half remembered conversations from 15 years ago, Hubbie got to finish off their daughter/sister.
Is he better off? Probably not.
Are they worse off? Most certainly.
"The law, sir, is an ***." Samuel Johnson
Just as 'shallow and superficial' as comments about the motive and character of people 'none of use have met or know anything about.' can be taken.ghostdog2 said:Code:I'm wondering if you are, in any way, embarrassed by such a callous statement
Code:
The only embarrassing thing is how shallow and superficial this discussion has become as virtual condolences and bogus sympathies are offered to people none of us have met or know anything about.
Someone posted about the husband now being able to move on. Wise up. He moved on long ago. The family? They got screwed. By virtue of a legal fiction and half remembered conversations from 15 years ago, Hubbie got to finish off their daughter/sister.
Is he better off? Probably not.
Are they worse off? Most certainly.
"The law, sir, is an ***." Samuel Johnson
Yeah, in fact, I'm planning a Celebration that is going to last all weekend long.. It's going to be bigger and badder than any of the Spring Break parties you may have seen on E! entertainment television. (I'm hoping for my own series - Wild on People Dying)Kane said:I really doubt her husband will mourn at all. He finally got what he wanted, and that is the death of her so called "wife".
While I know some of you maybe be happy, know this. No matter how much you think Terry wanted to die, there was no real proof at all that she wanted to die. In that kind of doubt we should have leaned toward life.
What is the worst about this whole case is that she couldn't even get a proper death. We really don't know whether she felt any pain, but let us say she didn't. Is it really justified starving someone to death no matter how much pain is felt? This wouldn't even happen to a dog according to what I have seen.
nods to you sir.michaeledward said:Yeah, in fact, I'm planning a Celebration that is going to last all weekend long.. It's going to be bigger and badder than any of the Spring Break parties you may have seen on E! entertainment television. (I'm hoping for my own series - Wild on People Dying)
And those damn Activist Judges ... one of those SOB's made a finding of fact that Mrs. Shiavo would not want to be kept alive by artificial mean. I suppose we can twist the logic around so a 'Finding of fact' and 'proof' are not synonyms.
Good Grief! - Even if you are correct (and by the way, you are not) these statements are so careless toward the family, and selfish to your point of view (or agenda) as to demonstrate exactly the opposite of what you claim; concern for life because it has 'dignity'.
I think that Mr. Shiavo has been mourning for 15 years. And today, he has entered a new period of mourning.
My wish for you is that you never need to experience a similar change in types of mourning.
Well, seems that someone doesn't appreciate a sensitive comment toward family with Rep responses/comments like this:loki09789 said:Yeah...real classy. Sympathies to her survivors: Parents, husband, other family and friends. Hopefully the healing can start.