Sorry for the big delay in replying to this point, John
.
My impression has been gained from the many links that BillC has put up to this fellow. I hold my hand up and admit that I have not read every word from those articles but in my defence I would claim that I do not have to form the opinion that he is usually talking propogandised {insert rude word meaning "sillyness" or "unconvincing verbage"}.
If you think that he has been right (or should that be "Right"?
) on what he's blogged up, then the ball is in your court to prove it to me. For, as a foreigner who is only interested through curiosity and because a number of people on this site talk about these matters (
all the time
), I have the luxury of being able to have 'just' an opinion that only needs the justification of perspective for me to voice it.