Manny
Senior Master
What would you do to make the TKD class you teach more classycal? I am tlaking about Classic TKD not olimpic competitive sport.
Manny
Manny
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What would you do to make the TKD class you teach more classycal? I am tlaking about Classic TKD not olimpic competitive sport.
Manny
Discipline. Hard core contact. Manners. Then, more disciple, more hard core contact and more manners.
Discipline. Hard core contact. Manners. Then, more disciple, more hard core contact and more manners.
i train at what you would call a 'classical/traditional' tkd club. We get heaps of 'sport' tkd people come over to us because they want a more "martial art" form of tkd. I think first and foremost there has to be a good breakdown of all aspects of tkd. For every kick we do we will do at least one punch. We certainly dont adhere to the old "tkd is 80% kicks" school of thought. Kicks are taught to be done 'low', we do some high kicks but the emphasis is not on high, spinning, flashy kicks. We do knockdown sparring (thats what i call it, the instructors just call it sparring), we basically try to knock the opponent down to the floor as quick as possible, no points, no competition. Sparring rules are also changed regularly, we do punching only (like boxing), kicking only, itf style, wtf style, 2 vs 2, 1 vs 2, 3 vs 1 etc etc we also have a heavy emphasis on 'self defence' usually taught by high ranking guys who are high up in the police force. It is straight to the point sort of self defence, very quick and brutal against the sort of attacks you will most likely come up against in the street. We also do a lot of self defence where you dont tell the defender what attack you are going to do to keep it unpredictable. We also do a lot of fitness and core strength work. I think all in all, keeping it 'real', head kicks are great, but way too much time can be spent practicing them, and people wont learn to defend their head against a punch if they 'always' spar under rulesets where a face punch cant happen. I havent trained at other clubs but i know that people who come to us for "old school" tkd are always very happy with what they find.
From what you have told us before on MT, you already teach a "traditional non-sport" oriented class, which resulted in your class enrollment going down to one student, sometimes two. Seems to me that would indicate people, at least in your area or your dojang, do not want a "traditional non-sport" oriented class. So why would you want to make it even more "classical" or even more "traditional non-sport" oriented? I would think you would want to go in the other direction, to make it more appealing to students.
I had two or three times 6 students but they no last and talking with some of them they leave so tired of the office that they only want to get home, also I've trying to reclute new members but they are not interested.
Manny
You are wrong, my two students love the way I teach. Yes we have poor enrolement of ADULT MEN but thta's only because men (like parents) are so deep in their jobs with cero time to do something like tkd afther work.
I had two or three times 6 students but they no last and talking with some of them they leave so tired of the office that they only want to get home, also I've trying to reclute new members but they are not interested.
Manny
"Classical" taekwondo, at least in the 1940'a at the Chung Do Kwan, was no contact sparring. Contact sparring came later.
I didn't know that. Why do you suppose that was?
And you think making your class more "classical" will increase membership?
Teach for the masses and the masses will come. Then you will have a great body participants to choose from when you are looking for serious students, who want to train hard. They will stand out from the masses. You can create a special, invitation class only for those people.
To do otherwise is approaching it backwards and as you can see, it will not be successful.
Thank you, I got your point. So you think I have to change the way I teach, something like do more WTF sparring training, or maybe focus in sport TKD instead the clasicla TKD?
Manny
Manny,
I don't think of what you call sport as separate. Sparring is fluent use of technique against a live opponent. Rules vary with the type of sparring. I think sparring is so important because it gives purpose to training. You train not just because "you might need it on the street someday", but because you will use it sparring here in class or perhaps at tournament.
I also don't think the focus is 'either sport or classic'; sparring is classical TKD in my mind (it's a key attribute of TKD that is Korean). There are many kinds of sparring, from the most basic one-step through full contact non-stop. Sparring is just another, more realistic, kind of skill-building. The challenge for the instructor is to build this in a progressive manner and not just put people in a ring and say "shi-jak". What kinds of sparring do you use in your classes now?
Carl
...we don't use the hopping/jumping motion of WTF olimpic kicking drills, we are not aerial instead we are conected to the ground...
Manny
I'm unclear on what you mean here. With the exception of jumping back kick, our sparring kicks have the base foot on the ground. Our footwork before the kick varies--sometimes front leg step/slide, back leg step/slide, or both feet hop toward opponent. But even the hop forward isn't what I'd call aerial--it's as low and fast as possible. Double and triple round kicks take more coordination and athleticism, but they are not what I'd teach early on with an adult group and you can spar very well without them. Is that what you mean by hopping/jumping?
Carl