I disagree entirely
The BJJ instructor at the gym I do kickboxing in is a BB thats is fairly disrespectful, to both TMA's, the boxing coaches for not being at every class because of things like sponsorship meetings and setting up cards, heck even to some of his own students if they start missing class. He's just always trash talking something or someone, everytime I've come in to work on my TSD kicks before the boxing coach gets there. Its pretty off putting, its depressing because hes the highest ranking BJJ instructor within 3 hours of my area.
The BJJ side of the gyms profile picture on FB was him and Kurt osiander flipping off the camera.
Thats cool for your own profile, but thats a very unprofessional way to run your school. Especially when you're calling your school a place to learn "respect" or "discipline"
Theres more to rank than the physical.
I dont care how good your side kicks are, if you're using them to kick dogs, bully kids, or just be a punk in general, Im not promoting you.
Nobody in my association would, and rightfully so
OK I agree with you, there should be more to rank than physical proficiency. There should be also mental proficiency and also when a student obtains a rank they should take on the responsibility that comes with it. Being a bully and acting the way that you describe the BJJ instructor at your gym is not taking on the responsibility that comes with rank.
What I was talking about when I mentioned rank should be based on proficiency and not time is that a student shouldn't necessarily be required to hold a rank for an X amount of time before they can be promoted to the next rank. If they've met the requirements of physical and mental proficiency, maturity and being responsible than there is no reason to hold them back. Just like I don't think a student should be automatically promoted just because they've been at a certain belt for an X amount of time, they also shouldn't be held back just because they haven't been at that belt for an X amount of time.