Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's got a lot of rising in his technique. In Jow Ga we were always taught that we don't rise to strike. This should be about the same for most Chinese Martial arts. The rising causes a break in the structure and increases the vulnerability. The height that you stand at is the height that you strike at. If you need to strike higher then raise your stance but do not raise your stance when you strike. The body should move forward to drive the power of the strike. When an upward strike is needed then the power for that strike doesn't come from pushing upward. It comes from pushing forward and keeping the structure of the punch.Maybe it's my non-WC eyes, but I don't see a lot of rising in the first one. He certainly does seem to on the first strike, and a bit on a few others, but the bigger difference (again, to my eyes) was that he was sending more from the hip (for power generation) than the second one, which shows in a shift in his head in the video frame. I'm interested in hearing WC folks' discussions of what they see in these.
Quite true, many schools of TCMA teach that methodology. While I see the purpose of this, it's not something I personally adhere to. I think it is to ingrain structure at the beginning level and with fundamentals. IMO advanced methodology requires use of leverage punching, which relies a rise or fall in movement, driving energy from legs, waist, spine to arms. Western boxing makes good use of this method, much more so than TCMA, but it is still present to a degree in some styles. I say whatever works best for you and you are comfortable with, carry on. Results are the only things that matter.He's got a lot of rising in his technique. In Jow Ga we were always taught that we don't rise to strike. This should be about the same for most Chinese Martial arts. The rising causes a break in the structure and increases the vulnerability. The height that you stand at is the height that you strike at. If you need to strike higher then raise your stance but do not raise your stance when you strike. The body should move forward to drive the power of the strike. When an upward strike is needed then the power for that strike doesn't come from pushing upward. It comes from pushing forward and keeping the structure of the punch.
Some schools may teach differently so this is just one perspective of this.
Quite true, many schools of TCMA teach that methodology. While I see the purpose of this, it's not something I personally adhere to. I think it is to ingrain structure at the beginning level and with fundamentals. IMO advanced methodology requires use of leverage punching, which relies a rise or fall in movement, driving energy from legs, waist, spine to arms. Western boxing makes good use of this method, much more so than TCMA, but it is still present to a degree in some styles. I say whatever works best for you and you are comfortable with, carry on. Results are the only things that matter.
So I wasn't the only one who thought a bit of AC/DC was odd for a dummy work video?"Hell's Bells"?
Without seeing the feet, it's hard to tell whether his hand and foot are coordinated or not. The punch and front foot (or back foot) landing should be coordinated.I'm interested in hearing WC folks' discussions of what they see in these.
My dummy practice largely involves applying force horizontally into the centre of the dummy, the dummy giving me feedback that my angles and structure are correct. There are moves that lift and drop the imaginary opponent, but the general trajectory is horizontally toward the centre of the dummy.
In the first one, IMHO he is exaggerating the shock power at the expense of flow, perhaps for demonstration purposes. In the second I would try to keep his flow but drive in a bit harder and sometimes at slightly different angles than the subject does. But, different strokes.
"Hell's Bells"? Seriously?
They are actually both staying in stance the guy in the top video has a problem with sink the elbow if you watch.I was just wondering how many of you stay essentially at the same depth of stance, especially when striking, vs rising slightly when striking? I have seen several videos like this oneor staying down like in this video