I don't need to. I just need to be able to hit him faster than he can draw, aim, and fire. Assuming that I've evaluated the situation and decided that fighting is the best option.no martial art can beat a bullet or are you faster?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't need to. I just need to be able to hit him faster than he can draw, aim, and fire. Assuming that I've evaluated the situation and decided that fighting is the best option.no martial art can beat a bullet or are you faster?
I don't really think that makes his choices any better. He adopted a 'defensive' stance, and then did nothing while he got shot?He said his stance was for defence after the guy said a second time to give him the chains.
We always used push ups and some other calisthenics for warm-up. Classes had no gaps between, so there wasn’t a good opportunity for students to warm up in advance.I have never seen any class that teacher would ask students to do their homework during the class time. Why should a MA instructor ask his students to do push up during the MA class time?
When I was young, I joined in a YMCA Karate class once. The Karate instructor wanted us to do push up, sit up, running around the room. One day I asked that Karate instructor, "I come here to learn. I can do all of those at home by myself." He then told me that not everybody would do those at home.
Even today, I still think he was wrong, and I was right. I strongly believe one should go to school to learn and come home to train. But some people may believe that they should go to school to learn/train and come home to rest.
Hi, I was trying to keep the story short. I guess I should have gone with the longer version (below). High-lighted parts are sort of new.He adopted a 'defensive' stance, and then did nothing while he got shot?
A good defensive stance doesn't actually look like a defensive stance. Assuming a stance that LOOKS like a fighting stance just contributes to the monkey dance.
then you must be RobocopI don't need to. I just need to be able to hit him faster than he can draw, aim, and fire. Assuming that I've evaluated the situation and decided that fighting is the best option.
I doubt it. Assuming a fighting stance doesn't require martial arts training.Ironically, he would have been better with no martial arts.
You're apparently not familiar with how long it takes real people to access and deploy a sidearm.then you must be Robocop
21 feet was the outcome from that testing. I think it was later revised further out. Within that range, they were unable to reliably deploy the gun to stop the threat before the "attacker" could contact with the knife. I seem to recall there being some issues raised about the methodology of the test, but none that would entirely invalidate the result (likely just make it less stark).Does anyone have that training video where LEO tested how far they have to be from someone with a knife to be able to draw and shoot before getting stabbed? I believe it was 21 feet.
I want to see this video too. I want to know what those with the gun were asked to do, and what else they could or could not do as the attacker moved in. Were the LEOs allowed to move back in order to maintain or slow down the closing of the distance as they drew their gun or anything like that?21 feet was the outcome from that testing. I think it was later revised further out. Within that range, they were unable to reliably deploy the gun to stop the threat before the "attacker" could contact with the knife. I seem to recall there being some issues raised about the methodology of the test, but none that would entirely invalidate the result (likely just make it less stark).
Here's a training video of it, keep in mind dan inosanto is the perp, which kinda stacks the deck in my mind, though I'd hope that he wasn't the attacker in the testing phase.I want to see this video too. I want to know what those with the gun were asked to do, and what else they could or could not do as the attacker moved in. Were the LEOs allowed to move back in order to maintain or slow down the closing of the distance as they drew their gun or anything like that?
I can’t stand them. As Jean Luc Picard, “They’re demanding, distracting and interfere with duty and pleasure alike”Reading through this entire thread, it really seems like some of you just don't like kids. Nothing wrong with this at all, as long as you aren't involved with any programs for kids.
You're apparently not familiar with how long it takes real people to access and deploy a sidearm.
When my primary instructor told me I'd have to have kids classes to keep a school running, I told him I'd need duct tape and wall hooks to store the kids until their parents got back.I can’t stand them. As Jean Luc Picard, “They’re demanding, distracting and interfere with duty and pleasure alike”
It was his confidence in his abilities that led him to the fighting stance. With no fighting abilities, he may have just said "ok, here you go".I doubt it. Assuming a fighting stance doesn't require martial arts training.
Martial arts training has a large proportion of repetition and attention to detail. In their initial stages, they are quite boring. Children simply aren't neurally developed enough to cope with this, they get bored, their minds are wander, they stand there with their legs straight in a ‘V’ shape, on arm extended, one down by their side, regardless of how many times you tell them. Yes, we can try and make the training more interesting by developing little games, dodging or blocking thrown bean bags etc but why not use these games in adult classes if they’re good training methods?I'm starting to wonder if those who don't like to teach kids come from places that ran martial arts like an after-school program.
I miss nerf gun guy. Let's bring him back.Does anyone have that training video where LEO tested how far they have to be from someone with a knife to be able to draw and shoot before getting stabbed? I believe it was 21 feet.
Mythbusters did it as well I believe it is available on you tube. Actually you may be able to draw and shoot but the bullet will not stop the person on time. It is the "Tueller Drill". On of the more famous demonstrations is in a video called defending edged weapons - 21 Foot rule dan Inosanto - Google SearchDoes anyone have that training video where LEO tested how far they have to be from someone with a knife to be able to draw and shoot before getting stabbed? I believe it was 21 feet.
Does this assume 9mm?Mythbusters did it as well I believe it is available on you tube. Actually you may be able to draw and shoot but the bullet will not stop the person on time. It is the "Tueller Drill". On of the more famous demonstrations is in a video called defending edged weapons - 21 Foot rule dan Inosanto - Google Search