Self defense that only incorporates the all in attack?
I look at it that way. I always expect the smother move. Especially from big guys as their means of attack. For me that is all in, and pretty much the riposte I would expect.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Self defense that only incorporates the all in attack?
I look at it that way. I always expect the smother move. Especially from big guys as their means of attack. For me that is all in, and pretty much the riposte I would expect.
At no point did I say I only incorporate that.Self defense that only incorporates the all in attack?
Which is fine. But it is still you suggesting that the violent encounters you experience follow a specific script.
Ant that was explained by you as due to your nature as a police officer.
That is not my experience. My experience is that violence can be unpredictable in nature.
And violent assaults of any kind can't be dismissed because people do the same in middle school. That is silly. People die from violent assaults.
At no point did I say I only incorporate that.
An most of those (not all, but the extreme majority) will have far less self-control than a skilled fighter has during sparring.Yeah, I don't think anybody did. You train for different types of encounters. An out of the gate robbery or sexual assault will have a different kind of violence behind it than someone looking to regain pride in a bar over an imagined slight after too much beer and they have to addressed differently in a civilian self defense context.
An most of those (not all, but the extreme majority) will have far less self-control than a skilled fighter has during sparring.
At no point did I say I only incorporate that.
Yeah, I don't think anybody did. You train for different types of encounters. An out of the gate robbery or sexual assault will have a different kind of violence behind it than someone looking to regain pride in a bar over an imagined slight after too much beer and they have to addressed differently in a civilian self defense context.
A few things.
When I speak of it from an officer perspective it is not just from the description of encounters of myself or fellow officers but from the crimes I have actually investigated.
Second, as for a script there is a general one on the larger scale, just like there is in life in general. Psychology is what it is and there is a psychology to violence. Because of this, depending on the circumstances surrounding an incident, you will have a lot of consistency in various factors of an encounter. If this wasn't the case Forensic Behavioral Analysis wouldn't be a thing. Now this doesn't mean you can predict the robbery suspect will have a knife, gun etc. It doesn't mean you can predict exactly when and where they will strike. But you can actually make a flow chart of sorts in a general sense. A mind the to following...
Robber approaches victim. Does Robber know victim? If not does victim give in immediately and give up wallet? If yes robber flees with booty. If no robber goes all in to get booty.
Now what results from "the all" in is indeed unpredictable. One person's definition of all in (if the victim doesn't get the upper hand) may be "they are stunned, take wallet and leave", where as another may be so violent they just stomp the victim into the pavement.
Also note I am talking about an out of the gate robbery. There are also robberies that I think of as crimes of opportunity which as a bouncer I am sure you have dealt with. Two people engage in a "bar fight", maybe in the parking lot. When the fight is over the "winner" decided to take the "losers" wallet, watch, whatever. Thing is that wasn't a robbery out of the gate, it was a fight between two people out of the gate that turned into a robbery at the end. The motive behind the violence informs the nature of the violence.
An most of those (not all, but the extreme majority) will have far less self-control than a skilled fighter has during sparring.
And nothing in my statement claims that anyone should ONLY prepare for "all-in". I made a statement about people involved in those situations are typically not well controlled. That's not "one style of attack", but a common characteristic of those attacks."This is one of those cases where what's needed for competition is different than the field, IMO. The guys Juany is dealing with probably aren't that patient, waiting for a prime opening. Probably not that well-trained or controlled, either."
Now this whole conversation is based on the idea that juanny does not need to have a depth of fighting ability to handle more than one style of attack. That is not self defence but police work.
you certainly havent mentioned you have disagreed with that idea. And that reads like you are supporting it.
You haven't mentioned what you incorporate. instead trying to make a street sport distinction that isnt there.
Sigh.Why does that make a difference?
Your training should be able to incorporate skilled and unskilled fighters.
It would be silly to be taken apart by a guy because he didn't know how to fight.
Sigh.
We've discussed this before. I'm not dragging the thread back through it.
And nothing in my statement claims that anyone should ONLY prepare for "all-in". I made a statement about people involved in those situations are typically not well controlled. That's not "one style of attack", but a common characteristic of those attacks.
Sigh.
We've discussed this before. I'm not dragging the thread back through it.
Ok. new tact.
Why do you encourage people to be mediocre?
Why do you insist I do? You have made it quite clear in the last month that you REALLY don't like what you think it is that I do. You've made it equally clear that you REALLY don't know what I do.Ok. new tact.
Why do you encourage people to be mediocre?
And What have I said that implies I think otherwise?I agree with Bear. It would be very embarrassing to be taken apart by an amateur.