- Thread Starter
- #21
"Your logic is a bit off but that's not the point."
I can believe that but could you point out specifically how?
"Systema is not so much what you do but is more of how you do it."
I thought I understood that but the 'how' guys were moving looked different to me from what I've seen so I asked BobP to explain to me what I wasn't understanding. He said I got to work with somebody in person. I think I thanked him for his answers & his time. Should I have said something else?
"Systema does have a 'signature' look but the hands down thing is NOT it :lol:."
The 'signature' is what I asking to have pointed out to me.
"At the same time the look is very individualistically influenced by the practitioners strengths."
Which is why I asked BobP if the Systema practitioner, in the video he provided, had a grappling background and if that was why his movement appeared different from how I've seen VV & MR move (i.e. it looked like a grappling match & not what I've seen VV & MR do in the videos I had seen). Incidently, those videos are 'Master of fighting', 'knife defenses', an older one called the foundation package (split into upperbody & lowerbody), VV's book and the newest video 2 disc set. I have liked what I've seen and thought enough about it to buy more. But I don't get why when I ask *specific* questions about a guys movement (like 'I don't get it what am I missing that looks like Sub Wrestling' or 'what did he do that you would call systema' or 'what should I look for that you would call classic systema technique/concept/tactic') those questions are ignored or I get an answer with basically what I asked.
Like:
Q: "'what should I look for that you would call classic systema?"
A: "Systema does have a 'signature' look but the hands down thing is NOT it."
Well OK but then what is?
If you don't know the answer thats fine. If you dont want to answer thats cool to but don't waste our time running in circles with answers like that. Just let the thread die. If I get the chance I'll go to a seminar with VV like you suggested. Maybe I'm just to thick headed to understand on this medium.
I can believe that but could you point out specifically how?
"Systema is not so much what you do but is more of how you do it."
I thought I understood that but the 'how' guys were moving looked different to me from what I've seen so I asked BobP to explain to me what I wasn't understanding. He said I got to work with somebody in person. I think I thanked him for his answers & his time. Should I have said something else?
"Systema does have a 'signature' look but the hands down thing is NOT it :lol:."
The 'signature' is what I asking to have pointed out to me.
"At the same time the look is very individualistically influenced by the practitioners strengths."
Which is why I asked BobP if the Systema practitioner, in the video he provided, had a grappling background and if that was why his movement appeared different from how I've seen VV & MR move (i.e. it looked like a grappling match & not what I've seen VV & MR do in the videos I had seen). Incidently, those videos are 'Master of fighting', 'knife defenses', an older one called the foundation package (split into upperbody & lowerbody), VV's book and the newest video 2 disc set. I have liked what I've seen and thought enough about it to buy more. But I don't get why when I ask *specific* questions about a guys movement (like 'I don't get it what am I missing that looks like Sub Wrestling' or 'what did he do that you would call systema' or 'what should I look for that you would call classic systema technique/concept/tactic') those questions are ignored or I get an answer with basically what I asked.
Like:
Q: "'what should I look for that you would call classic systema?"
A: "Systema does have a 'signature' look but the hands down thing is NOT it."
Well OK but then what is?
If you don't know the answer thats fine. If you dont want to answer thats cool to but don't waste our time running in circles with answers like that. Just let the thread die. If I get the chance I'll go to a seminar with VV like you suggested. Maybe I'm just to thick headed to understand on this medium.