May be slightly off topic, but since you guys are talking about the need of eradicating racism, just want to add that, from a psychological viewpoint, that's either incredibly unlikely or impossible. If it does happen, it will transfer to some other negative prejudices and stereotypes.
According to evolutionary psychology, people have it hardwired into us to form in groups and out groups, that way we can better protect our in groups. This relies on an idea that those that are in your "out group" are different then you in some way, and in general it assumes that people believe there own "in group" is superior to whatever they consider the "out group" although that's not always the case. This is generally done according to something definitive, ie: race, religion, location, but that's not always the case. The idea is that everyone, even people who don't view themselves as prejudiced, forms these groups, and views there own groups. I see it with many of my 'open-minded' friends, whom denounce any sort of racism/sexism/etc., but then will state that anyone who lives in texas is evil, or anyone in Kentucky is a hillbilly. It's very tough to fight the in group/out group mentality.
According to modern social psychology, people form schemas in their head, based on their own biases/experiences (these can be their own experiences or someone elses. For instance, I may have had girls cheat on me, and as a result, think women in general cheat. Or my dad may have told me when I was younger about how much women cheat, and as a result have the same opinion, without ever experiencing it myself). Schemas are not always negative, and aren't always inaccurate. In reality, schemas are a good thing most of the time; they help your mind digest information from the past and not having to reassess everything, or having your brain go into overload (ex: I have a schema about bears that they are dangerous, so I try to avoid them, and if I saw bear tracks I would not follow them. If I did not have that schema based on stories I've heard, I would either have to size up the tracks to see if they're scary, taking up time out of my day, or not think about it and end up as bear food). They're also accurate a good portion of our time. The issue is that our brains are so used to simplifying information like this, that it will unconsciously do the same about whatever, and again, it will generally take the most prevalent features of whatever it sees to make it's judgments, resulting in prejudice based on skin color/sex/etc. It's almost impossible to stop schemas, especially since you don't want to stop most of them, only some of them, and they occur without you even realizing it.
If anyone wants more information or clarification on either concept, let me know. If I wrote down everything I would be here for an hour, so I tried to shorten them to just the gists of each.
According to evolutionary psychology, people have it hardwired into us to form in groups and out groups, that way we can better protect our in groups. This relies on an idea that those that are in your "out group" are different then you in some way, and in general it assumes that people believe there own "in group" is superior to whatever they consider the "out group" although that's not always the case. This is generally done according to something definitive, ie: race, religion, location, but that's not always the case. The idea is that everyone, even people who don't view themselves as prejudiced, forms these groups, and views there own groups. I see it with many of my 'open-minded' friends, whom denounce any sort of racism/sexism/etc., but then will state that anyone who lives in texas is evil, or anyone in Kentucky is a hillbilly. It's very tough to fight the in group/out group mentality.
According to modern social psychology, people form schemas in their head, based on their own biases/experiences (these can be their own experiences or someone elses. For instance, I may have had girls cheat on me, and as a result, think women in general cheat. Or my dad may have told me when I was younger about how much women cheat, and as a result have the same opinion, without ever experiencing it myself). Schemas are not always negative, and aren't always inaccurate. In reality, schemas are a good thing most of the time; they help your mind digest information from the past and not having to reassess everything, or having your brain go into overload (ex: I have a schema about bears that they are dangerous, so I try to avoid them, and if I saw bear tracks I would not follow them. If I did not have that schema based on stories I've heard, I would either have to size up the tracks to see if they're scary, taking up time out of my day, or not think about it and end up as bear food). They're also accurate a good portion of our time. The issue is that our brains are so used to simplifying information like this, that it will unconsciously do the same about whatever, and again, it will generally take the most prevalent features of whatever it sees to make it's judgments, resulting in prejudice based on skin color/sex/etc. It's almost impossible to stop schemas, especially since you don't want to stop most of them, only some of them, and they occur without you even realizing it.
If anyone wants more information or clarification on either concept, let me know. If I wrote down everything I would be here for an hour, so I tried to shorten them to just the gists of each.