Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good Site...As a result of the Violent Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) and the Deparment of Justice conducted a series of studies of police use of force. In 2001, BJS published the Police Public Contact Survey. Its goal was to collect, evaluate, and publish statistics to better understand under what circumstances a traffic stop or other contact between the police and citizens becomes problematic. The report revealed that about 21 percent of the public had a direct encounter with a police officer in the past year--about half of these incidents were traffic stops. Less than one percent of people experienced an interaction involving the threat or use of force. 'Force' was defined as contact in which the officer pushed, grabbed, kicked, or hit the citizen. It also included dog bites, pepper sprays, and a gun being pointed toward or used against the citizen. The survey revealed that in the vast majority of incidents involving force, the officer pushed or grabbed the victim; chemical sprays were used in less than 10 percent of incidents, and guns in less than 6 percent.
Kevin Walker said:Police are:
1) After the fact, they arrive after the crime is committed.
2.) Are corrupt, since they frequently contribute to crime, getting rid of them would lower the crime rate. The United States has the highest crime rate in the world existing alongside the largest police force in the world. How can the two coexist if the police are effective against crime?
3.) Are violent, they frequently escalate and exacerbate a tense situation into a riot.
4.) Are hypocritical, Officer Friendly isn't friendly!
5.) Have become a state within a state, police unions frequently dictate terms to the mayor. Police have become a threat to democrary.
6.) Are undermining, registered voters have lost control of their mayor, and the mayor has lost control of his police department.
7.) and the police have become the first among equals, rules and regulations applicable to other civilians don't seem to apply to the them: i.e., police break the law to enforce the law, they shoot the shooters, they speed to catch speeders, and murder the murderers. They frequently act as judge, jury and executioner, as now commonly caught on videotape.
Kevin Walker said:My alternative to law enforcement in this country would be to do away with the police altogether and institute in cities and towns a constabulary and/or a night watch. There are small towns in Maine whose city and town councils won't allow a police force. A constabulary costs half as much as a police department and is equally effective/ineffective against crime.
The night watch would consist of neighborhood patrols.
A few years ago in Boston, the Guardian Angels did a better job of crime prevention than the Boston police. They embarrassed the cops and were asked to leave.
We know who the criminals are in my neighborhood, yet can't do anything about them without getting into trouble with the police. The police are useless and are not a deterrent against crime, so its best not to waste taxpayers money on them.
I hope this helped explain my utopia, a world without police, just a constabulary and a night watch. Thanks!
Magic exists in this world. I have seen it. I saw a police officer touch a little button on his radio and presto: Every other cop in the area magically apeared within a minute.Kevin Walker said:If you're a proficient martial artist with the requisite number of street fights under your belt, the cop loses.
Tgace said:The Police Officer
What is a police officer made of? He or she, is at the same time the most needed and yet the most unwanted...a strangely nameless creature who is "officer" to their face and "pig" behind their back.
They suffer from an overdose of publicity about brutality and dishonesty. They suffer far more from the notoriety produced by the unfounded charges. Too often, acts of heroism go unnoticed and the truth is buried under all the criticism.
The fact is that less then one half of one percent of police officers ever discredit their uniform. Thats a better average than you will find among clergymen.
A police officer is an ordinary man or woman who is called upon for extra ordinary bravery. Their job may sometimes seem routine, but the interruptions can be moments of stark terror.
They are the ones who face a half crazed gunman, who rescues a lost child, who challenges a mob and who risks his or her neck more often than we realize. They deserve our respect and profound thanks.
A police officer must be such a diplomat that he or she can settle differences between individuals so that each person will think we won. But if the police officer is neat, they are conceited. If they are careless, their a bum. If they are pleasant, their a flirt. If their not, their a grouch.
In an instant, they must make decisions which require months for a lawyer. But if they are in a hurry, they are careless. If they take their time, they are lazy.
They must be first to an accident, infallible with a diagnosis. They must be able to start breathing, stop bleeding, tie splints, and above all, be sure the victim goes home without a limp, or expect to be sued.
The police officer must know every gun, draw on the run, and hit where it doesnt hurt.
They must be able to whip two men their size and half their age, without damaging their uniform and without being brutal. If you hit them, they are cowards. If he hits you, hes a bully.
A police officer must know everything and not tell. They must know where all the sin is and not partake.
The police officer must, from a single human hair, be able to describe the crime, the weapon, and the criminal, and tell you where the criminal is hiding. But if they catch the criminal, they are lucky. If they don't, their a dunce.
If they get promoted, they had political pull. If they don't, their a dullard.
The police officer must chase bum leads to a dead end and stake out ten nights to tag one witness who saw it happen, but refuses to remember.
They run files and writes reports until their eyes ache, to build a case against a felon who will be let off the hook by his lawyer or an honorable who isnt so honorable.
A police officer is a protector in time of need and a comforter in time of sorrow. Their job calls for them to be a minister, a psychologist, a diplomat, a tough guy, a friend, and an inspiration. And, of course, they will have to be a genius, for they will have to feed a family on a police officers salary.
Good Point Sir.Those are the one's that get caught in a system that makes it easy for them to hide or deny offenses.
muaythaifreak said:As for your comment about "winning" against a police officer in a fight, don't kid yourself. Even if you kick the s**t out of him, (here's the good part), more are coming. If not now, later. So by all means, resist obstruct and delay. And when you do please visit my little county.
Yea you probably are right lol.Tgace said:I dont think anybody here is "for" it....
I think you are referring to my old post...let me state again. Its not a case of "IM right even if im wrong...". Its a case of; if I have probable cause, and based on all I see have reason to arrest you, Im "right" on that scene even if the fact is you didnt commit the crime (how am I supposed to know that?). What "proof positive" determination of guilt do you know of?From a System that teaches officers "You are always right, even when you are wrong, let the courts sort that out"