Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Though stewardship implies managing "you" on behalf of some other party, no? It also implies a temporariness, correct? If that were true, I would wonder on whose behalf are you steward of your body? And also what happens to "you" once that temporary stewardship is rescinded?If stewardship is the closest we can get to agreement, that is good enough for me. I think my concept of ownership is probably closer to stewardship anyway because I fully acknowledge my own impermanence. I can only "own" a thing for a little while until I dissolve into the mists of time.
Not necessarily. From the Merriam Webster English Language Technical Manual (that's engineerspeak for dictionary :lol: ):Though stewardship implies managing "you" on behalf of some other party, no? It also implies a temporariness, correct?
·ard·ship noun
\ˈstü-ərd-ˌship, ˈstyü-; ˈst(y)u̇rd-\
[h=2]Definition of STEWARDSHIP[/h]1
: the office, duties, and obligations of a steward
2
: the conducting, supervising, or managing of something; especially : the careful and responsible management of something entrusted to one's care <stewardship of natural resources>
If that were true, I would wonder on whose behalf are you steward of your body?
And also what happens to "you" once that temporary stewardship is rescinded?
you guys....
I leave you for a day and you turn a real estate story into the philosophical discussion on whether or not somebody owns his/her body....
It's really been about the establishment of basic property rights. I think a person does have natural rights over their body and over the products of their labor and over the things their labor affects. Whether we want to call these rights stewardship or ownership is matter of semantics, because both of these end up the same in the end.
That said, there are some interesting questions about property rights buried in this Lanai story. For one thing, the people wearing the black and the white hats aren't the people you think. Most of the time we think about the white man coming in and taking property away from indigenous people and murdering everyone. In this case, you had a Hawaiian conqueror who took the property, bundled it up, and sold it to the Haoles as one big chunk. The Hawaiian Monarchy allied itself with powerful business and banking interests and ended up shafting it's own people. That's one of the reasons why it fell.
So, who really owns this place?
So, who really owns this place?
Billionaire David Murdock and his company, Castle & Cooke Inc., are in discussions to sell Lanai in a deal that could alter the future of the former Pineapple Island and dramatically reduce Murdock's land ownership in Hawaii.
Castle & Cooke officials met with Gov. Neil Abercrombie and Maui Mayor Alan Arakawa late last week to say the company is talking with a buyer about a potential sale.
Abercrombie spokeswoman Donalyn Dela Cruz and Arakawa confirmed the meetings. Arakawa said it was a "serious consideration" by Castle & Cooke that could result in a decision soon.
No one at the meetings would disclose the prospective buyer's name, though some people are speculating that the island would appeal to other billionaires with ties to the island, such as Oracle CEO Larry Ellison or Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates.
Can you imagine if Bill Gates bought Lanai? I guess the story goes is that he rented every room on the island when he got married.
Ownership is an issue of law....
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Here we go again....:lfao:
Ownership is an issue of law....
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Ownership is an issue of law....
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2
Here we go again....:lfao:
"Law" is an illusion. :lol:
"You keep on using that word......"
Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2