loki09789
Senior Master
The practice of incense and annointing were common among many religious groups of the day. The difference in the quality, amount and source for these oils and incense may have created a signature though.Brother John said:True. I'd bet that it was to draw their attention to the common practice of annointing people or things with scented oils and the burning of scented wood. I don't recall where but somewhere in the old testament speaks of the prayers of God's people rising to Him like a sweet scent. So Paul saying that those saved by Christ had "a sweet scent" or whatever he said... would probably bring up recollections of holy things and holy events. Strong imagery. Think of what scents do to us. The smell of my moms meatloaf can make me hungry immediately. The smell of pine makes me think of majestic mountains. The smell of gunpowder, I can feel the patriotic nostalgia of the 4th of July.
Oh well... that's not really what this thread is about.
I think that it was totally innapropriate, the way this teacher presented this stuff, even What was presented was out of bounds.
HOWEVER: I don't think it's wrong to present the Theory of Evolution as a theory... and only one theory out of several, like the theory of intelligent design. This can be presented without presenting it with any one particular theology.
Something to think about.
Your Brother
John
I agree that Evolution, in science class should be specified as a theory (in the scientific sense, not the common use) to be completely accurate.
I still wonder what kind of institution the visiting teacher came from in Australia and what kind of Church/State laws exist in Australian public education. I would think that they would be similar enough that this text book material would not have been a wise choice.